I have begun to believe my mind is full of tiny little topics that act like pimples.

No one can predict the order they start to fester in, or when they’ll get ripe and burst.

Showing posts with label Decriminalize. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Decriminalize. Show all posts

Sunday, 2 March 2014

Renewal of My Complaint to Surrey City Council



Renewal of My Complaint to Surrey City Council

Do I Sound Pissed Off?

 

November 10, 2012 I e-mailed Surrey City Council some questions regarding the growth of Marijuana and the severity of the by-laws regarding its legal growth under strict supervision. It was named

An Open Letter of Complaint to Surrey’s Mayor and Council


The point of an Open Letter as set by Emile Zola with “J’Accuse” is to provoke a response from your opponent. After badgering them for only 20 weeks I finally got one Feb. 25. I was not disappointed with what I received because I have been expecting an evasion of all the questions asked. What I received was not a report with any detail or suggestions: It was a  178 word e-mail that boiled my questions down to 3 that were anwered:

1.    It’s City Policy – 3 lines – 32 words
2.    No. – 3 lines – 36 words
3.    Little use but advised location of some files.- 104 words

It is not a Reply from Council: it is a Reply from the City Solicitor.
I think I am quite correct that on receipt of my Open Letter, the clerk noted the Marijuana and automatically referred it to the Legal System where it sat. I doubt the Mayor and Councilors ever saw a copy but I think this will correct t.

I don’t get ignored and dismissed by some pompous shyster with an over-inflated self-image.



This has now turned into what will be the Publication on the Blog of me and Council having a good argument





Renewal of My Complaint to Surrey City Council

TheSmeeGoanGuy Blaine Barrett thesmeegoanguy@gmail.com

4:17 PM (1 minute ago)

to Clerks, bcc: me
Ref: Legal Services File # 3900-20-17410
In Mid- October I e-mailed Surrey City Council some questions and on the basis of advice given by phone sent them to you at
Attn: Mayor and Council
I was advised that on receipt with that Attn; Mayor and Council you would ensure that a copy was made for and sent to each individual councilor.  In early November, two weeks after submission I called and was informed my complaint had been received and a referral to Legal Services was warranted and they would advise when it had been considered.
After one month of patience and one more month of frustration and no reply to requests for information, I finally contacted the City Solicitor, Mr. MacFarlane just before Christmas and was advised he would look into it but due to his schedule requested I call back after the New Year and we could get down to details. He was reasonable, polite and seemed to understand my frustration when I vented. No problem.
We reconnected in Mid-January and talked things out. In anticipation of misunderstanding I requested a reply in writing and he agreed to supply one.
This was the beginning of dodging my request for information and refusing to contact me despite manifold requests that he do so. He received those messages via Lisa his secretary who confirmed she had relayed them all. Only after I relayed a message via Lisa that either he could contact me within one week or I was getting on the phone to Mayor Watts and raising shit did I actually get a result.
If Mr. MacFarlane had the courage and courtesy to phone me so we could have discussed his findings I would not have written this complaint.

MacFarlane, Craig

Feb 25 (3 days ago)

to me, Lisa
 Hi Mr. Barrett:
1.                In answer to your first question, regarding access to City property to campaign for the Sensible BC Referendum, it is City policy not to allow political campaigning in City recreation facilities.

The whole point was to ask Council “WHY” it was City Policy. I want to know how a Referendum qualifies as “political campaigning” and I want an argument showing how it does. I think it’s a violation of my Elections Canada qualifications and : and it is an infringement of my own personal right as a private citizen to ask a fellow citizen a question about his knowledge and provide corrective information if he requests it. There is no political identification except the advisory that there is a Referendum in process and there is no political gain.
2.               You have asked whether there will be a revision to the “Medical Marijuana Growth By-law”. In 2013, the Zoning By-law was amended to prohibit the cultivation of marijuana in all zones except the C8-B Zone.
I never asked whether there will be a revision to the “Medical Marijuana Growth By-law”. I was trying to determine if there is any way to negotiate a modification of the bylaw to permit the growth of Medical Marijuana in areas other that Zone C8-B. That is still my intention.

3.       Regarding the source of the “800 addresses as targets for surprise grow-op bylaw inspections”, I have been advised that Health Canada through our federal Freedom of Information request informed the City that 788 Health Canada licensed producers were located in Surrey but that no information was given as to the identity or location of the sites. The City does have information on the location of approximately 300 grow- ops, which information was obtained through Hydro excess consumption records and the subsequent inspections for electrical and fire safety. The City also receives information on the location of grow-ops from complaints made to the City.
This was extremely helpful in advising that No Personal information or Locations of Grow-ops has been provided by Health Canada. He was also helpful in identifying the 300 grow-op files on hand as a source of information related to all the hazards Chief Garis has concocted related to the cultivation of marijuana.
 Best regards,
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>

I want to continue with a modified complaint but there is little point in doing so until I know that Council has actually received and read my initial complaint. As yet I have not received an acknowledgement of receipt from anyone except Legal Services.

I do not have a file ref for my original complaint but it can be found at

City of Surrey Legal Services File # 3900-20-17410.

I would very much appreciate that a copy of this e-mail be forwarded to all the Council with a request for an acknowledgement from each that they have received and read my initial complaint before I file a continuation. Can this be done?

Best regards
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>

I Wonder what I’m Going to Get Back

?

<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>

Friday, 31 January 2014

An Open Letter To Campbell River Council



An Open Letter To Campbell River Council

Deny the RCMP Request for DARE Funding



Dear Mayor Jakeway and all Members of Council:

Re: D.A.R.E. program needs funds

Please deny this request. The purpose of the Drug Abuse Resistance Education program as run by the RCMP has little or nothing to do with educating youth . That is simply the justification for an extended period of physical interactive contact by police officers with the pre-teen age children of Campbell River. It is intentionally timed as they emerge from elementary school and prepare to enter middle school. There they will become exposed to and contaminated by the anti-cop reality of their next ten years in the teenage world. This is a pre-emptive presentation of a more positive RCMP image before the favorable one cultivated in childhood gets exposed. This is how the intimate contact time with students is designed and works.

D.A.R.E. provides opportunities to establish positive relationships between police, children, parents, teachers and other community members. This is a friendly time between the class and usually a pair of very nice personable young cops in uniform. These individuals have been specifically selected and trained in the cultivation of personal relationships. Their task is creating a bond of trust with each student to not only the instructors but also to the uniform they wear. This is successful in a subliminal establishment and belief that if a police officer asks you a question you should answer because he can be trusted. That is false: the worst instruction a child can be given.

So: Who Is This Guy?

That friendly young Instructor is a Cop. Never doubt it. He’s a complete stranger from someplace else who knew nothing about your community until the day of his arrival, and the community knows nothing about him. He’s not so young: he’s probably a university graduate; he’s completed his basic training, served his street apprenticeship. He’s been with the force about five years and has intensive training in Investigation, Interrogation and has mastered his observation and detailed reporting skills. The majority of the time in contact with students is a time totally devoted to questions and answers about all kinds of topics while he takes notes and leads the questioning.

The instructor not only listens but observes and records minute details that can disclose not only an individual’s history but also his personality and his social relationships in the class. Interrogation training notes body language: facial tics and nervous movements in reaction to pressure. Innocent questions can identify members who are his closest friends, his confidants, and all this is on file.

So What’s The Problem?

If as the instructor requested, a student “Bill” at some point in the future say 6 years later after graduation, Bill gets a call and consents to answer some questions about a “friend” in an interview. All of this information will have been reviewed by the Inquisitor on the other side of the table beforehand. Bill knows that the questions concern his good friend “Jack” but not what they are about. His friend Jack has been caught on camera in the commission of some crime in town XYZ 200 miles away the day before. He was identified and a check on his DARE details revealed a link to Bill as a close buddy

The Interview Process

In the course of the interview Bill is asked Jack’s whereabouts and honestly answers he didn’t know where he was. He volunteers Jack was going to XYZ to collect some money he was owed: he also admits he knew that for a week because he had been pressuring Jack for payment of a debt. To the interrogator that moves Bill into a Person of Interest category because he has knowledge connected in some way to their investigation. The crime may have been planned in advance considering the time frame. Considering the motive was money for Bill that also raises the possibility of a conspiracy and Bill now gets advanced into the Suspect category. Woe is him because he is now a target and the inteerogator presumes him guilty. All future relations with the Cops are on the basis of their attempting to bully him into incriminating himself into an admission of his presumed guilt.

How Can This Happen?

The sad part of this story is that Bill had never been informed of his rights as a citizen of Canada. He has the right to refuse to answer any questions on the grounds he might incriminate himself. but despite his completion of his formal Canadian schooling he, as every other student in this country, has never been exposed to any course dealing with their Civil and Charter Rights as citizens and how to protect those rights when they are threatened. Supporting DARE is a contribution to a program that increases the vulnerability of your youth to the misuse of the Law by some authority and a violation of their rights without the knowledge to protest and protect themselves.

If you still can’t understand, or will not accept advice from a nobody, I suggest you pay attention to the following damnations of the program by authorities far more knowledgeable than either you or I will ever be.

40+ years ago in 1972 the LeDain Commission blasted the criminalization of marijuana by DARE and recommended the removal of cops from the classroom. The US National Academy of Sciences, the US Surgeon General and the US General Accounting Office have all condemned the DARE program as a failure!

Since 1998, 16 years ago, the US Department of Education prohibited schools from using federal funds on DARE.

12 years ago the Nolan Reoprt of the 2002 Canadian Senate Special Committee on Illegal Drugs concluded that "prevention strategies in schools should not be led by police services or delivered by police officers" and that “the RCMP should reconsider its choice of the DARE program that many evaluation studies have shown to be ineffective;”

I can’t understand why Council is considering a program that has demonstrated itself to be nothing but an RCMP Propaganda and Intelligence Exercise.

Council should be much more interested in creating and funding a program to advise these same teens in their rights as citizens in the legally bewildering world they are entering in their transition to adulthood.

In Closing:
I suggest the council defer to the conclusions reached by my cited experts and refuse more funding for DARE.

I also suggest that you recognize the shortfall in our education system and its failure to teach students properly with regard to their rights. You can render our youth far more service by pressuring the Province, at some point before their graduation, to include a compulsory course in the value and purpose of their Civil and Charter Rights.

While you’re at it, add an additional request for another compulsory course in Financial Management. At the current time a High School graduate has had neither training nor experience with money management beyond spending what he can pry out of Mom and Dad. They have no idea of how to assess and determine a budget to survive paycheck to paycheck much less create an investment strategy to prepare for retirement 40 years in the future.

Our children need training in both these areas in order to successfully survive in the complex Legal and Financial jungle they are entering with adult independence. The world seems heading for a global disaster and almost inevitable shortages of almost everything that hasn’t already been polluted and rendered useless. Inflation and old age are inevitable and their rights and money are basic tools for successful survival in the world ahead: and the next generations need to know how to use both to their advantage.

On that note I leave you. Do as you will.

I would be remiss if I did not advise you that this letter in its entirety is being published in my blog:

Medical Marijuana with TheSmeeGoanGuy
At

Regards
BlaineBarrett

Friday, 20 September 2013

An Open Letter to Mr. Gerry McNeilly; Director of the OIPRD



An Open Letter to the Director:
of the
Ontario Office of Independent Police Review
655 Bay St, Toronto ON M7A 2T4


Attn: Mr. Gerry McNeilly; Director.

Ref: OIPRD Complaint #130005918
Sir:

You apparently think you are immune from criticism and that since there is no appeal possible you got away with treating me like a minor pain in the ass and beneath the notice of a BIG SHOT like you.

I AM NOT A MINOR PAIN IN THE ASS!
I AM THE EQUIVALENT OF A HAEMMOROIDECTOMY!
I AM A FIRST CLASS REAMER OF ASSHOLES!
IT’S YOU’RE TURN!

Just for clarification, this is an Open Letter and will be published in my blog
 when I see fit. 
It won't be long

Medical Marijuana with TheSmeeGoanGuy

The first and foremost mistake you made you fool was to not admit you had never seen my complaint or had simply failed to read it beyond the six months deadline criteria or you would have noticed the crime is still in progress.

I can’t stop the bastards but you can and to fail to do is Malfeasance in office and you are guilty of a crime against every one of the 4100 victims who’s Medical Files have still not been returned to them.  The crime is still in progress. Get it?

Just in case you are too stupid to even know what malfeasance is:

When a contract creates a duty that does not exist at common law, there are three things the parties can do wrong:
  • Nonfeasance is to ignore and take no indicated action - neglect.
  • Misfeasance is to take inappropriate action or give intentionally incorrect advice.
  • Malfeasance is hostile, aggressive action taken to injure the client's interests.
You’re guilty of all three.

You rejected my complaint because I didn’t ask for help. I told you to read the fucking complaint and arrogant egocentric narcissistic bureaucrats don’t take orders.

You never once thought about what the potential damage could be as a result of one vindictive Cop holding onto 4100 Medical files. You are really fucking stupid. These are not the files of just anybody! They are all for very sick people who needed them returned to maintain symptom relief. You gave absolutely no consideration to that even though you have to be aware that these are the severe symptoms of major diseases.
Have you even read an MMAR Form B1 or B2? There is not one qualifying condition that does not have its own unique battery of nasty symptoms. Have you any idea of the nasty side effects of the touted Big Pharma drugs? I didn’t think so: you’re too busy counting your return on your Pharmaceutical Portfolio. The last thing you fucking Big Shots Bureaucrats and Doctors want is something to cure Cancer. You’re income would be shot down to middle class and that is unthinkable.

I am going to make you think about how you fucked up. I am going to attempt to contact every one of Dr. Kamermans Patients and ask them to file a formal complaint with you for the crime that is still being committed against them.

I’m going to make it easy for them and prepare a template that all they have to do is fill in their details and send it to you. The crime is identical to mine that you refused to investigate. All they have to do is file the form, reference my complaint number and declare the details are identical and advise you the crime is still in progress.

What you gonna do now fat boy? I hope to create even more fun for you and you can look forward to a flood of complaints about the same fucking crime by the same fucking cop and you have to deal with each as a separate complaint. Enjoy your future problem. Too bad you can’t use that tried and true six months bullshit over and over but I don’t think that will wash now. You’ll need some creating thinking here or
“HOLY MARY! Mother of Christ!”

You might actually have to get off your ass, start an investigation and get those valuable files returned to their owners. Somehow I doubt you have either the power or the skill to pull that off.

On a personal note Gerry, I honestly wish you could experience all of the pain, the vomiting, the shits and the manifold other soul wrecking symptoms inflicting that patient pool. I thought that Stephen Harper was the lowest form of slime sucker but your even lower in the cesspool.

Have a good day
I am.
Blaine Barrett

I guess, considering your elevated position 
KING OF THE BULLY BLUE BASTARDS  
I can expect a response in keeping with their sense of values!




 Go ahead! Send them!


ASSHOLE!




Monday, 9 September 2013

The Mernagh/Kamermens Difference



Warriors, Victims and the Law

A Clarification Regarding the Difference
between
Matt Mernagh v. Dr. Rob Kamermans



At the beginning of August I wrote An Open Letter To Matt Mernagh that resulted in a back and forth series of increasingly revealing e-mails that effectively destroyed the high regard in which I held him. I expected to contact a compassionate Medical Marijuana proponent, knowledgeable, and most importantly someone up to date on the impact that the vindictive application of the Law can have on a victim. So much for expectations based on propaganda.

What did I find?

A complete and total asshole! I was advised that all Dr. Kamermans had to do was hang in and just do as he had done and everything would work out fine. Matt didn’t believe that Doctor Kamermans was in any sort of money trouble! If his pro-bono College provided lawyers had weaseled out he wouldn’t have any trouble getting a new crew, all he had to do was pay for them. Ho! Ho! Ho!

To say I was surprised is an understatement so I decided to check out just what Matt had done to earn his reputation as The King of Pot. Just how relevant was his conflict with the Law to that of Dr. Kamermans? Turns out Matt’s high opinion of his own legal expertise is based on fuck all except patience and perseverance.
It took him ten years, a crew of supporters, and a hotshot lawyer to lose and consent to get a License from Health Canada. Big deal, he lost but in the narrow mind of his followers he’s a hero because he had the balls to attack before he became a victim. That makes any similarity between the two cases a straight impossibility.

What further destroys Matt in my eyes is that he’s got a loose fucking mouth. In one of my communications to Matt I specifically asked that he keep confidential the information that I was considering asking Bob Erb to consider helping Dr. K.
I never followed through with that intention but within one week, the slimy fake name slander artist Coe Hill was spouting my confidential information on Facebook. I have no idea who Coe Hill might be and I don’t care. When I see Matt and I have one mutual friend we share and that is Johnny Fredette, then that is all the linkage I need to establish his source of facts about Dr. Kamermans to be coming directly from The Baleful Bitches of Bancroft. He’s a believer in gutter gossip and not to be trusted.

Sorry for the departure into Character analysis when what needs clarification is the difference in the two cases and that means outlining what each of these legal combatants faced in the years of legal confrontation and therein lays the difference.

Matt is a Warrior: Dr. Kamermans is a victim.

Let’s take a look at what happened to Matt, the warrior, during the course of his encounter with the law.

First off, Matt was guilty of a crime! He admits that. He was smart enough to realize that the MMAR was a crock of shit and there was an excellent possibility he could evade arrest and the consequences by challenging the law itself. He was right.

I have no idea how he did it or what help he had, but he managed to prepare an acceptable submission and on a day of his choosing he walked into a courthouse and presented a package of argument that admitted his guilt but asserted there was no crime because of legal deficiency. The filing fee was paid and he walked out on his own recognizance, blanketed with an immunity that prevented his arrest as a confessed criminal until such time as the case was resolved. It took ten years of relative peace and freedom from stress until he lost and the penalty for his crime was submitting to a court order to either get a License or actually do some minimal time. To the disgust of many of his supporters, Matt caved and applied for a License.

Note that because he was a warrior and began the fight he successfully evaded every nasty consequence that could have; more likely would have, been inflicted on him. He has absolutely no idea or expertise in handling anything from a defensive position and victim.

Following is what happened to Dr. Kamermans. If you are a Mernagh fan and consider him some sort of a legal advisor just ask yourself how either he or you yourself would have dealt with the following;

1.    You are a Medical Doctor and you become aware of the victimization of Medical Marijuana applicants who have an acceptable qualifying illness their doctor has successfully diagnosed and documented. The whole damned crew of your Canadian Medical Association brethren have refused to sign and betrayed their oath to do no harm. You check with a lawyer who advises by signing applications you are not approving or recommending anything but simply declaring: on the basis of their documented diagnosis they qualify for acceptance by Health Canada. There is no crime involved in what you are going to do.

2.    You accept your legal advice and for two years you sign, at an ever increasing rate, a flood of applications and then in the course of your normal daily office routine you get surprised. A combined force of OPP and RCMP complete with a SWAT Team with terrorist firepower and asshole leadership oozing Cop mentality storm in and hand you a search warrant. The leader of the wolf pack is one Sergeant Mark Duval: King Turd of Coe Hill, the same son of a bitch who is still committing Criminal Negligence. You are not arrested but they slap both you and your wife into handcuffs, jam you into a Cop car, slam you into a cell and subject you to a fun filled day of hostile Cop interrogation before releasing you without charges. WTF?

3.    You return to your office to discover that all the confidential patient files relating to Medical Marijuana have been seized and removed and for the next four months you are subjected to a vicious harassment and slander attacks from the politically correct police perverts. They conspicuously stake out your office and home, regular local patients are unnecessarily stopped when they leave after a visit. They are falsely accused of being a druggie and lowlife in the most hostile and intimidating manner. Slowly but surely your practice and income base are getting destroyed by fear of the Gestapo tactics encountered by your patients.

4.    In April the axe finally falls. The decision to arrest you is made and Sergeant Rob Henderson takes the initiative to make that arrest in the most damaging way possible. Rather than wait until the next morning to arrest you at home, Ratfucker Rob takes a crew and drives 200 miles to arrest you in mid-shift at the Sturgeon Falls Emergency Room so that you will be deprived of that source of income. The fact they leave the community they are supposed to serve with no resource if a medical emergency arises is not as important to them as ruining you.

5.    In the following six months and that is as far as I will go, you have to come up with $60,000 bail money of stay caged, you go to your bank and withdraw money to pay your US mortgages and get arrested for trying to launder the proceeds of crime. The cops use that as leverage to force all your financial resources (Two banks and the Credit Union) to cancel all your accounts including your credit cards. This had the effect of establishing that you were subject to arrest at any time and accordingly your only other source of significant income was lost. Your other ER position was lost because of the possibility of another mid-shift arrest. You are slapped with a No Contact gag Order that prevents you from defending yourself, your phone is tapped, they’ve bugged your house and office and you have no idea what they’ve installed into your computers when they had access to them so forget any confidential e-mail traffic.

If Matt is so certain Dr. K has a pisspot full of money stashed somewhere then where is it. Why would a guy with a pile of cash have been depending on pro-bono legal services from College insurance if he had other funds available? None of that illegal money is in any Canadian account nor is it in the USA or the IRS and DEA would be all over his ass.

I’m going to end here. I’m tired of being forced to listen to comments about Matt Mernagh as if he were doing something to help Medical Marijuana at present. He gained a position of respect and a voice that would be listened to if he had taken advantage and come out as a voice for the victims who are facing ruination with the MMRP.

All Matt has done since he caved in is promote himself as a TV clown and expert on marijuana cultivation, strain selection, the resultant products and methods of use. Big fucking deal! That might be some use if it wasn’t totally useless in an environment where all personal growth is illegal. All he’s doing is advising how to get maximum benefit from your illegal activity when you decide to grow your own.

The majority of opinion I see on Facebook by current Licensees is that the MMRP is going to be ignored and people are going to intentionally break the law and grow their own because of medical and financial necessity. They are fully aware that they are probably going to be arrested and while Matt may be a useful source of grow advice he could do better service trying to prevent their arrest in the first place by raising a voice of protest now. Unfortunately that prospect never occurred to him because he has never ever been arrested and suffered any of the consequences of victimization like Dr. K.

Matt, my boy: If you have a problem with this I’m prepared to defend my conclusions. As my evidence base I’ve got all those secret confidential communications between us I don’t think you want seen.
Challenge me and I’ll publish the whole goddamned list and let my readers make their own judgment of the King of Pot.

Balls in your court you asshole

Blaine Barrett


Friday, 30 August 2013

A Politician Actually Listened to Me



A Politician Actually Listened to Me

The NDP Town Hall with Tom Mulcair

Sheraton Guildford: Fraser Room 1:45 PM
September 29, 2013

Dear Diary:

SURPRISE! SURPRISE!

Today I went to an NDP Town Hall Meeting with Tom Mulcair here in Surrey. I had no idea whether I would get the opportunity to speak with him. I wanted to ask about Medical Marijuana  and what the NDP could do to help with the disaster coming with the implementation of the MMRP. Not to worry!

Anticipating failure I prepared a request to be forwarded to someone in the NDP Hierarchy who could answer my questions with specifics and not generalities.
On my way into the meeting, I was fortunate to meet Jasbir Sandhu, my MP. He remembered me as the Marijuana Advocate who bugged him a year ago and after reading my written request, promised to forward it to Mr. Mulcair’s inner circle. Bonus! Half way there- somebody is going to have to deal with me. LOL.

I’m not dumb and when I took my seat I noted the position of lights, camera and the big Red Cross on the floor and positioned a seat where I could see his face at all times when he was speaking to the camera. This had the advantage of Mr. Mulcair having me in his field of view. There was an introduction our local MP hosts and then Mr. Mulcair took the stage. During his introductory speech he and I eyeballed each other and sized the other guy up. I think I got him right.

I think he got taken by the Bassett Hound eyes I inherited from my father. You know: that pleading look you get from buddy when you eat that great big hunk of steak. Tom proved he can recognize desperation and took pity on mine. The minute he opened the floor to questions and Holy Bejasus Mother of Earth and the Cannabis God struck and Mr. Mulcair pointed to me and I found myself with a microphone stuck in my face. What now??

I identified my self as a Medical Marijuana Licensee and advocate and more or less asked him this.

“I am aware of the party policy regarding this whole legalization kerfuffel and I am largely in agreement with it. There are millions of questions to be answered but nothing is going to be implemented until a change of Government 2 years away.



I have a much more immediate short term problem to be dealt with and that is how to survive the destruction of the Medical Marijuana Program and the financial consequences of the MMRP.

He listened seriously


I’m a Senior on fixed income, I have occasional neurological pain and depression. I can only afford a minimal 2 gr./day dose at the cheapest source: HC at $315/month. A probable doubling of that cost from entrepreneurs and the difficulty in accessing vendors will simply divert me to any illegal source who undercuts the profiteers. That applies to virtually every other licensee whwere the only alternative is grow your own and risk mandatory prison time just for relieving symptoms. Would he and the NDP give this a problem a priority consideration and try to help with our problems?

I’m not going to try and quote his reply except to say that he accepted my request and Medical Marijuana will be a priority in all NDP consideration of whatever develops regarding Marijuana at large.

More importantly than misquoting his words: I Believe him.

I sat through another 45 minutes listening to him on a very broad range of problems facing Canadians and while I don’t wholly agree with some of his answers I trust him to honour his word based on his excellent background and knowledge of the political history of Canada. I actually think I may have found a Man of Character who understands the moral and ethical principles that Canadians have always valued as a matter of pride.

I finally found a Canadian Politician worthy of my respect: He’s one of a small handful from 50 years of disgusted observation of the Ottawa circus. He’s got good company with Broadbent, Layton and Pearson.
He may not like the company of good old Pierre but liking is a personal matter. Respect is earned.

Enough praise and Kissy Kissy for Mr. Mulcair. While he comforted me with his leadership role, he did not provide me with any specifics re policy and understanding of the problem. That will be forthcoming as a result of that Request for Information that Jasbir Sandhu is passing on.

This is the Request for Information I submitted:



<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>

Thursday, August 29, 2013


To Someone familiar with NDP Party policy and plans regarding Marijuana.

My name is Blaine Barrett and I live down the street.



I am an Advocate with a Blog.

“Medical Marijuana With TheSmeeGoanGuy”
at

I am familiar with the Party position regarding Legalization of Marijuana and have no problem with it. That is a long term problem for you to deal with. What I want to know and will publish if informed is just what is the Party proposing to do about the immediate problems facing the Medical Marijuana Patient population by the stupidity of the Medical Marijuana Research Program. It’s passage will financially destroy access to sufficient dosages of marijuana to provide proper relief for their symptoms.

It’s time for some clarification and I would like to be contacted by someone with the ability to provide specifics and not generalities.

I can be reached at 604-585-0236 or by e-mail to

In anticipation of a prompt reply
Best regards,

Blaine Barrett
You want to know who I am just Google the Word


Now I wait!


And so must you!

UNTIL???



Monday, 26 August 2013

The Baleful Bitches of Bancroft







Coe Hill Renames Herself Again
She’s Back:
Cat Peever this time



A Foreword I hadn’t planned.
Without intending to I have insulted Cat Peever and for that I must apologize. I was unaware that she is a real person and made the mistake that it was a nom de plume for one of the terrible trio of traitors. While I disagree with her comments she has absolutely no connection with the slander artists I condemn.

I must also correct the impression that there is a connection between Annie Oakley, the character assassin and Charlie Renaud. Charlie was using Annie Oakley an her page name at the time but my Annie Oakley confidential informant turned out to be a cop with a wiretap on Dr. K’s phone or a bug planted in his house. All the details are laid out in my previous post The Cops are Vicious Sons-of-Bitches archived under February, 2013 on the right hand side of this page
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>

To continue


In a previous post I effectively challenged Matt Mernagh to help Dr. Rob Kamermans and I upset Cat Peever so much that she sent two comments to the post. I have deleted them from the blog but posted one here because I want to show how this bitch distorts the truth. I am almost certain this is Coe Hill back from the dead in order to spread more dirt. She should know better. As I have advised all Anonymous contributors that nasty shit without a factual base is a no-no and is not acceptable for the blog. Please ladies relax I am not calling all of you bitches just Vycki, Lori and Johanna

 Cat Peever Comment #1: 



Sorry Dude!  I know of the case that Matt was referring to there and indeed there was one patient who I personally know of who was refused a signature by Dr. Kammermans as that person was on minimal disability income and simply did not have the required funds to pay.  This person was told,  "no cash, you cannot see the doctor"...

Wrong, wrong, wrong, Cat! The only one who makes that sickening accusation is a sick bitch with mental problems and an axe to grind and hurt feelings because Dr. K. wouldn’t put up with your rotten fucking behavior: 

Johanna, Vycki or Lori? Which one are you? 

It’s one of you three ex-employees all of whom have an axe to grind. The guy who took pity on you and your fucked up mental condition and gave you employment is in trouble and your hurt feelings make you backbite and slander him. The factual part of all your dirty little insinuations and allegations give you away as his employees

Over and over and over again one or all of you’ve assumed false identities that turned out to be fake. Anonymoius Freddy Elderf, Annie Oakley, Coe Hill and now Cat Peever crawl out of the slime barrel as an assumed identity for one of you bitches. You pop up someplace where a favorable comment has been made about the Good Doctor and you make the same bullshit claim about the elderly disabled and Cash Up Front, but that is you’re modus operandi. Over and over the same bullshit allegations with never a name of the victim. 

There’s a whole goddamn crew of you out there I’ve got some allegations to make about you and your fucking despicable behavior.

Every body would like to know why you’ve got this vendetta with the good doctor so I’ll deal with you all in chronological order of employment.

Let’s deal with you first Johanna Comeau, you were the first one that showed up on his doorstep crying for help and kissing his ass to get hired. He noticed your mental shortcomings and took pity on you and gave you a job. You didn’t last long because you then showed your true bitch nature to everybody. You offended everybody with your nasty disposition and foul mouth when irritated. When the complaint level from customers and even your fellow staff got too much to forgive Dr. Kamermans was forced to fire you. Even then he took pity on you and on your recommendation hired your sister (sister-in-law?) Lori Stephenson, who presented as another mental defective to take pity on. Unfortunately she also has a genetic defect called “Treason Tongue” just like you, Johanna.

Lori; You really screwed up. Dr. K thought you were a valuable friend and a trusted employee right up until the day you quit because of those “death threats” you started receiving after his arrest. That was probably bullshit thought up by Johanna but I believe you probably got a “death threats” call from Vycki Fleming and you believed her. You quit your job and Dr. K gave you an excellent letter of recommendation and then you and Johanna went to the cops and helped kick start the Assassination of his Character. Actually Lori I think your just a chicken shit coward afraid of your Comrades.

But now we come to the chief bitch of all, you Vycki Fleming.

You probably did threaten Lori into quitting Vycki. You’re the most vengeful and I think the one with the most motive to smear him.
1.    He cost you money

2.    he told you to fuck off and

3.    ruined your plans for a DG license. 

Those are offenses that an egotistical narcissistic bitch like you can’t handle. You only worked a couple of months with him but it was your advocacy and big goddamned mouth that set of the grape vine and the avalanche of patients Dr. K couldn’t refuse to treat.

Vycki, you had a goldmine set up with Dr. Saul. You did the legwork and located the patients and fed the money machine until he got fed up and fired you. You were demanding $250 in advance for your advocacy and the Doctors fee. You then submitted the forms to the Dr. and paid him his $100 fee. Everybody was happy as a pig-in-shit until he found out you were getting a $150/ patient finder’s fee. End of goldmine! Not!

You moved on to Dr. Kamermans and shifted your traffic to him but you couldn’t con the Doc to play your game but that didn’t matter. You had other moneymaking plans in progress. You conned Dr. K. into giving you and your boyfriend employment at $10/hr which really didn’t suit your self image. It put you in the position where you could get some leverage as an employee and ask for his help for your boyfriend. He really was sick and looked it and you had him apply to Dr. K. for a signature He turned him down flat and there went your plans as his Designated Grower. I guess you thought that the sicker the better: a really sick applicant would get a bigger dosage. Stupid! You should have picked a boyfriend who wasn’t the survivor of a 30 year career as a professional Drug Addict. You and your walking skeleton left and you have been trying to get even ever since.

This is just the opening shot in my war against all those so called friends of yours who help you with rah rah comments when you slime the Doc when he gets some good press. In particular there is one asshole named Johnnie Fredette who’s got a big fucking mouth and if anybody reading this can clue me in on the asshole please message me on FB.
I also have a few choice comments to make to Matt Murnagh the object of Cat Peevers praise and admiration. Matt needs an attitude adjustment and he can’t keep his fucking mouth shut.

Let this serve as fair warning to anybody inclined to shoot their mouth off about Dr. K in any FB group without facts to back it up. If I find it I will rip your ass up. Make allegations without support and I’ll return the favor. I think I’ll do good at that, I just had a 1200 word practice.

That’s it for this post but I have follow-ups half wrote so stay tuned

Blaine Barrett