These Cops Are Criminals!

“Four Complaints about Transparency and

Bullshit Bureaucracy”

Smee again:

Thursday I mailed a Complaint to:

The Independent Police Review Director of Ontario.

Today I e-mailed a complaint to:

The Honourable Rob Nicholson,

Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada

about the matter

and to this

I attached a copy of: my complaint to

The Honourable John Gerretsen

Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Ontario

and

to this I attached a copy of:

My Cover Letter and My complaint to

The Independent Police Review Director of Ontario.

I have no idea how this Director got involved here:

These turkeys horned right into the middle of my problem dealing with a

Federal Criminal Code Violation!

Where the hell a group of Ontario does based provincially appointed

political hacks with a pro-cop bias gets the authority to interfere

with my charging a bunch of Cops with a Federal Crime?

I decided to find out.

If you don’t ask you don’t get!

This post is simply a copy of those e-mails and the Cover Letter. I did not include the text of my complaint to the Director because I have previously established the grounds for the charge of Criminal Negligence with my post at the bottom of this page         

“A Request for Consideration re a Class Action Lawsuit”

Read on, enjoy a literary exercise in mild sarcasm

Then we wait for the answer to that imponderable mystery:

Can a needle jab from a mouse make an elephant fart???

Here’s a dose of reality!

<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>

A Question Regarding Criminal Code Enforcement

The Honourable Robert Douglas Nicholson
Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada
284 Wellington Street
Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0H8
CC: Justin Trudeau- Liberal Party of Canada: Thomas Mulcair- New Democratic Party: Elizabeth May- Green Party of Canada: Alain Prefontaine - Director General and Senior General Counsel

Dear Minister:

Attached please find a copy of my Complaint to the Office of the Independent Police Review Director of Ontario and a copy of my Complaint to the Ontario Minster of Justice. They regardsa serious violation of Criminal Code Section 219 – Criminal Negligence by the Ontario Provincial Police on January 26, 2012. I am advised this is the only route by which I can get an investigation of what I assumed to be a Federal Crime is to ask a Provincially appointed Review Director who will have complete control over any investigation of Criminal Wrongdoing by Ontario Police Forces and his decision is final.

They advise me that:

1. “The OIPRD is responsible for recording and classifying all public complaints. We are also responsible for deciding who will investigate the complaint. Your complaint may be investigated by: The OIPRD, The same police service the complaint is about, or another police service.”

2.      If, during the course of the investigation, the Director discovers evidence that an officer may have committed a crime, the matter will be referred to the police for further investigation.

3.      The OIPRD does not conduct criminal investigations.

4. The OIPRD does not deal with discipline, disciplinary hearings or appeals on policy and service complaints.
5. They further advise me if I disagree with the result:
6. “The OIPRD is an independent organization and our decision is final”.

Why am I compelled to submit my request for justice to a bunch of anonymous political hack appointees who collectively call themselves the Director? I have no idea who they are, probably ex-cops and I have no confidence in the OPP chain of command conducting an impartial investigation and no reason to trust them based on the pro-cop bias previously displayed like G20 and G8 and going nowhere.

The facts are simple and a matter of OPP record that need no further verification: They are all recorded by Sergeant Duval who supervised the SWAT Team that accompanied him on his atrocity of an arrest. Under his direction the OPP seized medical records that are vitally important to their owners and still has them in custody nearly 18 months later. The seizure was common knowledge to the OPP upper ranks and no-one in the chain of command recognized or bothered to point out that they were committing Criminal Negligence under Section 219 of the Criminal Code. Nobody bothered to go to the trouble of telling the criminals to return the documents.

Today, critically ill Medical Marijuana patients still can not access their records if needed for treatment assistance. OPP actions were not only wanton and reckless disregard of the harm they were doing to the 4100 patients who needed them, but intentionally and vindictively designed to prevent renewal of all 4100 licenses by holding the documentation required for their renewals. The OPP simply didn’t give a damn about the pain and agony they were intentionally creating with the recurrence of symptoms that had been under control with their marijuana use.

I don’t understand the Provincial usurpation of Federal authority that appears to have taken place.

Has any Minister of Justice ever agreed to only the OIPRD investigating the Cops with no recourse?

What is happening here? I suspect a whitewash Kangaroo Court by the Blue Brotherhood?

 Please advise if there is any way to evade the dominance of the Police in this matter to avoid having this atrocity classified as a misdemeanor and dropped?

I apologize for the necessity o contacting you with this request but I had no option

In anticipation of your reply.

Respectfully

Blaine Barrett

<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>

A Question Regarding the Enforcement of the Criminal Code in Ontario

The Honourable John Gerretsen

Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Ontario

720 Bay Street, 11th Floor
Toronto
M7A 2S9

Dear Minister:

Attached please find

1. a copy of my Complaint to the Office of the Independent Police Review Director of Ontario and
2. a copy of my E-mail to The Honourable Robert Douglas Nicholson- Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada
    

I send this as a courtesy advising this problem because I think you will become involved and you need to know the details in order to answer two simple questions:

The only consequence of any contravention of law by the Police in Ontario is an order to investigate themselves by the OIPRD. That guarantees a whitewash result that will turn their felony into a misdemeanor that calls for a verbal reprimand. The OPP actions in this matter resemble a bunch of sub-humans inflicting pain, aggravation, and punishment on people who are sick, have committed no crime and have no defense against Nazi tactics.

Do they have your permission to act like savages or are they just ignoring the illegality of their persecution?

Can you give me any reassurance they are not going to circular file this complaint like they have with the G20 goons?

I’d appreciate straight answers not modeled on the Harperite Transparency Principles. The Cons deem any and all questions an insult to Fearless Leader and a terrorist attack that renders all answers subject to a No Comment because of National Security concerns.

In anticipation of your response

Sorry to ruin your day.

Blaine Barrett

<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>

Cover Letter

Complaint to Office of the Independent Police Review Director

Office of the Independent Police Review Director

655 Bay Street, 10th Floor
Toronto, Ontario
M7A 2T4

Attn: Complaints

Dear Director:

First I must inform you I am submitting this Complaint to you under protest.

I don’t think you have the capacity to achieve the result I want in the time frame I have left in this life. I am commanded to submit the Complaint to you and I don’t understand why I have to submit to an investigation of the Police by the Police. I am lodging a complaint that Section 219 of the Criminal Code of Canada was intentionally ignored and violated by the whole bloody chain of command of the Ontario Provincial Police. No-one is exempt and that includes the Chief of Police/Commissioner of the OPP. He’s letting these criminals run wild. I would prefer a different police force if possible?

I don’t understand you, as a Provincial official, deciding matters of Federal Law. I have read your website thoroughly and by submitting this to your authority I am compelled to accept your decision as to the guilt or innocence based on an investigation of a brother by his Blue Brotherhood. The only other option is to withdraw the Complaint and walk away. I would like clarification of three phases of your advice regarding

How will the OIPRD handle my review?

.

1. The OIPRD will also contact the police to tell them you have requested a review and give them a copy of the form. We will ask the police to send us all the information they have on your complaint.

• What time frame are we looking at? What is the maximum time they can take to respond and provide their documentation?

2. Once we have received your file from the police, we will assess your case and make a decision about it.

·        How long will that take?

3. If we agree you, the OIPRD will give instructions to the Chief of Police/Commissioner of the OPP about your complaint. The police must follow these instructions. We will tell you about our decision and what happens next.

·        What if I disagree with your proposed instructions to Chief of Police/Commissioner of the OPP? Do I have any input or control as to how the investigation should be conducted?

In anticipation of your acknowledgement of Receipt of my complaint:

Best regards

___________

Blaine Barrett

<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>

Until next time: Go Figure!

Comment re Dr. Reid’s Statement re the MMRP

lucie.boileau@cma.ca

Comment re Dr. Reid’s Statement re the MMRP

Attn: Lucie Boileau,

Senior Advisor, Communications and Public Outreach

Dear Ms. Boileau:

Could you please ensure that this is forwarded to Dr. Reid. The Licensees of the MMAR have quite a different perspective as to the position of the CMA re Medical Marijuana and she should be aware of our input. The image we get isn’t that flattering, just obstinacy run ridiculous.

Regarda:

Blaine Barrett

TheSmeeGoanGuy

Statement from the Canadian Medical Association on new regulations on Medical Marijuana

OTTAWA, June 10, 2013 /CNW/ - Canada's doctors worry that today's announcement of new regulations to govern the use of medical marijuana ignores the fact that there is no clinical evidence to back up its use as a medical therapy. 

1. You automatically discard 5000 years of testimonial advocacy by their predecessors in the profession and insist on valuing only research conducted by Medical Doctors with financing from Big Pharma. Utilization of non-patentable drugs is simply not profitable.

This approach runs contrary to Canadians' position on this issue as reported in an Ipsos Reid poll conducted for the CMA earlier this year. The poll found that 85 per cent of Canadians believe that medical marijuana should go through the same rigorous testing and approval as other medicines.

2. You fail to point out that the public knows even less about cannabis than you do and they actually believe that the CMA is acting in the best interests of the patients. Nothing could be further from the truth. An opinion based not on knowledge but on faith in a bunch of money grubbing liars is not worthy of consideration.

Asking physicians to prescribe drugs that have not been clinically tested runs contrary to their training and ethics. Expecting doctors to write prescriptions for marijuana without the existence of such evidence is akin to asking them to work blindfolded and potentially jeopardize the safety of patients.

3. You righteously declare the testimonial evidence of the past bears no weight with the current CMA fixation on Scientific Methodology. Given the amount of literature regarding other scientifically significant discoveries regarding benefits of cannabis for a wide variety of conditions you are insistent that only results from studies yet to be conducted will be considered.

Marijuana is a complex substance with strains that vary greatly in power and effect, but we have no information on potency, dosage or how it interacts with other therapies. The beneficial effects of marijuana have not been rigorously tested and it has a huge potential to cause harm. With the federal government vacating its role, there is no one to certify that the drug will not harm the patient.
Federal rules and regulations dictate that before a drug may be prescribed, rigorous research and testing must be undertaken to establish safety and efficacy - this research includes clinical trials. As a result of the rigorous research requirements, physicians know how much to prescribe, what the benefits are and what the side effects could be. None of that information exists for marijuana. We don't even know what is in the various strains of marijuana. 

4. You don’t bother to explain that the only reason for no information is the government failing to spoon feed it to the CMA. You are too lazy and have never taken the initiative over the past twelve years and too short sighted and narrow minded to accept that there is benefit in the use of the ENTIRE cannabis plant. It apparently has never dawned on them to observe patients at large with a specific ailment and document their response to the various hybrid strains that provide symptom relief. That seems a common sense approach and a guide to which strains to examine for the specific cannabinoid component that yields that response. The CMA wants to complicate common sense by starting with a couple of hundred cannabinoids with no known linkage to any specific symptom for any specific disease and would result in a massive research boom for your buddies in academia to tackle the great unknown. Expect results at the next turn of the century!  

The Ipsos Reid poll also found that almost eight in 10 Canadians agreed that Health Canada, as the body that approves prescription medicines for safety and efficacy, should maintain its current role in authorizing the use of medical marijuana for patients.
Patients would not want us to prescribe drugs for heart disease, cancer, or any other illness without the scientific evidence to back those drugs up. Why does the federal government want us to do so with marijuana?
 
5. Because you have no compunction about prescribing your approved “Pharmaceutical Standard Side Effects” of Sativex and Marinol to patients who don’t want them. Side effects are a standard practice in modern pharmacology and the medical and pharmaceutical professions don’t know how to react to a drug that has none.

The use of medical marijuana has grown because there aren't better treatments for people battling chronic pain. This is an area that definitely needs greater attention. The federal government will not help address this lack by abdicating its responsibility to protect the health of Canadians.
Let me be clear that physicians are deeply concerned that many patients have great difficulty in their battles with chronic pain. Clearly there is a need for more effective pain treatments. The CMA has been asking for years that marijuana be treated the same as any other drug and its use backed up by research and clinical trials. The federal government will not help address this lack of evidence by abdicating its responsibility to protect the health of Canadians. 

6. Stop the bloody finger pointing. The CMA has no more credibility than our stinking government at this point. As far as evidence goes, does the CMA expect Harper to promote, much less finance anything that resembles Harm Reduction? On the other hand, the Government would be equally right in thinking the CMA would reconsider their blanket damnation of testimonial evidence from generations of ethically superior healers. They actually had a close doctor/patient relationships that went beyond their patients ability to pay. Unlike our current generation of CEO’s.

Dr. Anna Reid
President, Canadian Medical Association
SOURCE: Canadian Medical Association

For further information:

Lucie Boileau, Senior Advisor, Communications and Public Outreach
lucie.boileau@cma.ca

A Request for Consideration re a Class Action Lawsuit

A Request for Consideration re a Class Action Lawsuit

An Introduction and Preface to my Request

I have no idea where this will lead or the consequences of my actions. I have been warned by smarter men than me including John Conroy that I shouldn’t do it, that I’m drawing a great big bulls-eye on my back for the cops to stab.

My Response

Tough shit! This is important!

I hadn’t thought of possible repercussions but I’ve been forewarned, so I’m advising you that if in the future I wind up charged with some heinous crime like domestic terrorism or pornography because of pictures planted on my illegally seized Computer, don’t be surprised.

Vengeance is mine sayeth the Blue Brotherhood,

Today I am attempting to initiate a Class Action Lawsuit on behalf of myself and 4100+ other Medical Marihuana Licensees who had their files seized and held by Sergeant Mark Duval of the OPP after raiding Dr. Rob Kamermans office on January 26, 2012. I am alleging that the holding of those files for this extended period constitutes Criminal Negligence under Section 219 of the Criminal Code.

The following Request for Consideration was sent to severalmajor Class Action Litigation firms in Canada simultaneously with the publication of this Post. I will not identify those firms and by open publication of my request, any and all Class Action lawyers can judge its merits and decide if they would consider representing 4100 sick patients who were intentionally damaged by one police officer acting in the name of the law that he, intentionally or not, broke.

I did this on my own without consultation with anyone because I am a vindictive SOB and too much damage has been done to my Brotherhood of Victims to not demand reparations. I am doing so because if I can convince one of those firms that there is a legitimate case and accept it, I set in motion an action that cannot be stopped even if I croak because there is the potential for great profit if the case can be won. If I assume that a minimum recovery of $1000 per victim would be reasonable with a pool of 4000 victims that is $4 Million and beaucoup bucks for our legal representative if they win.

This is on a straight trade basis: they take on all risk and expense for their possible win and the collection of about 1/3 of the money pool awarded. They shove some money in my pocket; I don’t begrudge them a finders fee even larger if they crucify a few cops and politicians along the way..

Once the case is submitted to a court and accepted, a public notification will be made and anyone who had their file seized will be able to share in any win simply by adding their name to the victim list. There is no cost or necessary effort required and then it is waiting to see. If anything more were required it would be a request to supply the nature and cost of the damage you have suffered in order to estimate the overall severity and impact of harm done by the Negligence.

If you are a victim don’t do anything yet just let me know you are aware and would like to participate. The waiting to see what happens has started and I’m among you.

I have come to the conclusion that the only way that the Harper cruds can be made to back off is to tell the public the truth about the slime-ball tactics they are employing and arouse enough outrage and support to threaten Harpo politically. One of my main curiosities is just how the mainstream media will play a lawsuit of this nature? Are they curious enough to go and dig up some more dirt: or are they going to ignore it as effectively as they have blacked out the outrageous persecution of Dr. Kamermans?

What led me to start this action? I share a fatal flaw with Dr. Kamermans in that we come from a generation that valued matters of principle. To be a man of Character was a matter of pride and we both had mothers with high principles who drilled its fundamentals into us.

So where does this “Character” get us in this modern day and age.

Not very far at all apparently

Dr. Kamermans saw a population of “patients” with a medical need that he could legally fulfill by signing application. For this he has been arrested and persecuted by the Bancroft police into personal ruin before he has even been brought to trial.

So much for “Innocent Until Proven Guilty”

So where does that leave me?

I have to bear witness!

I am doing so

How will our police state react to my Freedom of Speech?

This simply a test exercise of my Freedom to Speak

Ready

Set 

GO!

A Request for Consideration re a Class Action Lawsuit

My name is Blaine Barrett

I live at 255, 10202-149St., Surrey, BC V3R 3Z8

SIN: 606-283-653

I have a Health Canada License to obtain and possess cannabis

Phn: 604-585-0236

E-mail: Thesmeegoanguy@gmail.com

I have been the victim of Criminal Negligence by Sergeant Mark Duval of the Ontario Provincial Police and his superiors at the Central Hastings Detachment in Madoc, Ont. I am accompanied by 4100 other as a consequence of the arrest of Dr.Rob Kamermans, the seizure of his Medical Files and the refusal and failure to return them to their owners

On January 26, 2012 Sergeant Duval and a force of combined OPP and RCMP officers entered the office of Dr. Rob Kamermans at 2230 Hwy 620, Cob Hill, On  K0L 1P0: arrested him and served him with a search warrant for his office. They were accompanied by Swat Team members armed with assault rifles who immediately secured the area to prevent any terrorist attack and announced their arrival with a parade of cop cars, flashing lights and sirens that no one within sight or hearing could avoid noticing: The objective- Guaranteed headlines.

Dr’ Kamermans and his wife were alone in the office at the time of the invasion. They were arrested, handcuffed, forced to pose in front of a cop car for pictures of their arrest. Sergeant Duval and cohorts proceeded to ransack the office in a search for evidence of some unknown crime. In this process, Sergeant Duval seized and removed 4000+ medical records for inspection of their contents. He knew they were of vital importance to their owners, full of secret information he wanted but covered by Medical Confidentiality: so did all his superiors.

I do not believe that access to the contents of 4000 file can be justified by one single search warrant for a Doctor’s office. The Official Policies of both the Canadian Medical Association and the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario state that the contents of any medical file in the custody of a Doctor can only be revealed to medical professional necessary for treatment.

Any outside third party access must be authorized by a warrant for that file. Every file was entitled to secrecy and a warrant. If this was an intentional illegal breach of privacy by the police it was an illegal act repeated every time they stuck their noses into a file. And on and on.

None of that matters to me because I’ve tried to find out for over a year if it was legal and failed. No one will answer at any level of responsibility.

It does not matter whether file secrecy was illegally breached or not, what makes me a victim and entitled to recourse and justice is that Sergeant Mark Duval failed to return files with the utmost speed to the patients to whom they belonged. Every person in the chain of command knew that the failure to return these documents to their rightful owners was to cause great hardship and inconvenience

I am one of the patients who had their applications seized. There is no record of my application because it wasn’t yet in the files: it was waiting for me to get back to them with a replacement cheque. He had not yet signed my application and all my documentation was in the Hold file. I submitted my application in Mid-January and got the call a week later but hadn’t sent a replacement cheque yet because there was no rush. I was outraged by the seizure, inspection and refusal to return the medical files. It was a outrageous invasion of privacy but I couldn’t complain. My file had not yet been formally entered as a Medical File in his records and not yet subject to Medical Confidentiality as private. It was just laying there, wide open.

It was only two weeks ago that I became aware of Criminal Code Section 219

Criminal Code – Criminal Negligence

·        219. (1) Everyone is criminally negligent who

(a) in doing anything, or

(b) in omitting to do anything that it is his duty to do,

shows wanton or reckless disregard for the lives and safety of

other persons..

Sergeant Mark Duval, The Central Hastings Detachment supervisor and everyone in the OPP chain of command right up to Queens Park and on up to the prime Minister was aware of the arrest and that 4000+ Medical files had been seized and held as evidence, It was front page news and a subject of controversy and discussion at the time of the seizure. Nobody lifted one God Damned finger to stop the crime in progress. It is common and accepted knowledge that Medical Files are not only private but also of critical importance in the treatment of the patient should there be any change in his condition. In times of emergency these are the only source of any medical knowledge of the patient’s condition prior to the current trauma.

Sergeant Duval and everyone in his chain of command knew that there would be serious consequences to the patients who owned them if the files were not promptly returned and there was an emergency. That is simply common sense and a fact. There is no excuse of ignorance on the part of the whole chain that this was a flagrant violation of Criminal Code Section 219 that every law enforcement officer should do no third party harm.

They were fully aware that they would intentionally be creating the risk of great harm in an emergency. What is more contemptible is that this was in search of information that was beyond their legal reach in the top secret files of Health Canada at the Medical Marihuana Access Division. The identities, locations, class of grow-op, capability and size, the most importantly the expiry date of every one of 4000+ Medical Marijuana The last date of issue was before New Years 2012 so every one of them has now expired.

Sergeant Duval is still holding these files and has not returned them, and not one of the superiors above him countermanded his action and ordered their return before anyone suffered any harm from their inaccessibility. What is most contemptible is that all them also was aware that all licenses had a one year expiry and to not return them and deny access to all the extremely valuable medical documentation they contained was an intentional obstruction of the renewal of every Medical Marijuana license.

The resultant harm can now be tallied up and it is time the cops were stopped from arresting and charging medical marijuana grow-ops and possessors when their crime was the direct result of the arresting cops preventing their renewal. It’s a premeditated entrapment.

There have been many more serious cases of patients who have been harmed by lack of access to their medication and I have heard of one death before information requested was forthcoming after great efforts to get its release. A great number of symptom recurrences and physical agony resulting from the inability to grow and maintain an adequate supply of what should have been their legal medication supply.

I think the failure to recognize the consequences of their action was intentional and criminally negligent. Sergeant Duval was aware of the consequences of his actions and simply ignored the damage he was causing. To me this is a wanton and reckless disregard for the lives or safety of others and a violation of Criminal Code Section 219. The chain of command was aware of and ignored his actions and did not order him to cease and desist immediately. They were aware of the damage being done and by failing to correct their subordinate similarly showed a wanton and reckless disregard for the lives or safety of others and are guilty of a similar violation of the Criminal Code.

That is my complaint. I am a victim, I have been damaged and I have a lot of company who are as angry as I.
Blaine Barrett
N.B.
This is not an isolated instance of the intentional disregard of Section 219. It has become common practice for and increasing number of police actions across Canada. As just one of two examples I know of a licensed designated grower whose license expired because of the callous disregard shown in my case. It may be hearsay but it appeared in Facebook.

It was a large facility handling two grows for patients with authorization for large quantities of edible cannabis. The grower was arrested, his crop chopped, all cannabis seized, all grow equipment worth thousands destroyed or confiscated. They were fully aware that the two licenses to grow were large and destined for patients with symptoms severe enough to warrant the size of the licenses: and that the cannabis that they destroyed was a legal medication and to confiscate it was to initiate the recurrence of pain, nausea, and manifold other symptoms.

There have been multiple similar instances of smaller personal and designated grow ops being shut down because of the intentional obstruction of their license renewals.

In a similar vein, the police disregard for the necessity of dispensaries and their arbitrary closure causes great harm and inconvenience to every one of their customers. They don’t sell to the street, they sell only to licensed customers and their closure has the same effect as chopping down a designated grow op.

Today is May 20, 2013 and as I write this the cops are in full scale callous disregard of Section 219 and are still knowingly inflicting harm to innocent third parties per the following Headlines today:

Medicinal pot patients risk safety in search of weed

Closure of a Halifax dispensing club forces patients to seek illegal drug sources

CBC News Posted: May 11, 2013 7:21 PM

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/story/2013/05/11/ns-medical-marijuana.html