I have begun to believe my mind is full of tiny little topics that act like pimples.

No one can predict the order they start to fester in, or when they’ll get ripe and burst.

Showing posts with label misrepresentation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label misrepresentation. Show all posts

Saturday, 20 September 2014

The Ly’n King of the VPD



The Ly’n King of the VPD

 

 

Constable Brian Montague

Media Relations Officer

 

 

N.B.:  
Shortly after I published this post Constable Montague replied and said he wasn’t going to deal with me any more. He also advise the above picture is not him and asked me to remove it. 
I replied:
As far as the picture goes I got it from Google Images after a search for ​"Constable Brian Montague VPD" and all the pics with that name are that guy.
I said you're a liar and I'm more inclined to believe Google. The picture stays until you can provide another. I suggest you call Google and complain or provide me with another that you approve of. Until then, the picture stays as is!

 

 

 

Greetings again Constable Montague:

I am truly disappointed that you have failed to contact me. You made the mistake of putting your direct telephone number (Brian Montague T: 604-717-2807 ) at the bottom of your reply to my questions to the Mayor, the Chief and you about why the raids on the Jim’s Weeds Dispensaries and the SWAT team tactics used with no justification.

 

A reply from a Media Relations Officer was completely unexpected. I may only be a Blogger (http://goan-smee.blogspot.ca/) but I like to think of myself as half-assed decent Investigative Journalist asking a lot more relevant questions than the National Media lot who claim the title.

 

I replied to you and informed you who I was, the reasons for my complaint, and advised you I would phone you the next day tenth of September and did!

 

I have now phoned you twice, requested a return call, left my phone number and waited. Dead silence for over a week. Why did you bother to reply? I never expected one. If it was a compliment for the “fascinating approach”, Thank you!

If that was the only reason and you had no intentions of answering any questions then Fuck You! I truly wanted to deal with a Cop Mentality first hand. I have a degree in Psychology but no experience with the Abnormal.

 

I don’t want to talk any more because another Cop has a looser mouth than yours and disclosed what’s up. I was told by a VPD drug squad member that they are actively investigating all the clubs and dispensaries (prioritizing based on community complaints) by sending in undercovers to see if medical diagnosis is required as well as if minors are able to purchase. So it is advised that these protocols be adhered to.

 

Which brings me back to Jim’s Weeds and no probable cause and a couple of questions that you will never answer because your primary function is damage control and you would not be in your position if you were not a very skilled professional liar and distorter of the truth.

 

Your primary function is to put a lid on the problem until it goes away. The misuse of the exemptions in the Access to Information Act allows you to declare that there is an investigation in process and then claim any disclosure of information could damage the result. There is no time limit on investigations and given enough time the video showing the three cops beating the shit out the woman in the wheelchair will be forgotten and no answers or explanation are required.


Unfortunately no-one will ever find out what was accomplished by raiding Jim’s.
From the news reports Some unknown source complained that there was some unknown customer who was buying very cheap pot from Jim, and then in defiance of Jim’s rules, reselling to unknown youth in the neighbourhood. Jim did nothing but sell to a qualified customer.

If that was true there was no probable cause. But I will never find out, it’s under investigation and you would never answer truthfully answer questions like:

  1. Did you have a warrant based on these anonymous allegations? I doubt it!
  2. Did you find anything incriminating during the raid? I doubt it?
  3. Were any unlicensed or under age customers present? No!
If there had been Jim would still be in jail!
  1. What did you find that justifiged seizure of the shop’s contents?
  2. Was there a probable cause for that? I doubt it!
  3. What evidence did you get from the pot plants you seized?
  4. Did you return them before they died? I doubt it?
  5. Quite obviously you never discovered any evidence of a crime or there would have long since been charges:
  6. Have you returned all the seized products? I doubt it!
  7.  Are you going to try to charge Jim for storage? Probably: he’s got no place to put since you bastards forced him out of business.

Jim was an example of what all Dispensary owners should be: the best of the whole lot. He was damned near a saint to his customers. He was a source of accurate information about Medical Marijuana use. He could determine what your condition needed and recommend something that would help relieve the symptoms you were having! He could tell you the genetics of the source and for many of them a verifiable estimate of its cannabinoid ratio and content.

His only crime was selling the best and cheapest pot in Vancouver (at times as low as $3/g. for poor people) and probably in Canada by running an online supply line to other poverty stricken victims from coast to coast. The VPD busted Jim just as the Halifax Nazi’s are currently busting Christopher Enns and Farm Assist for persecution on a technicality.

I think I’ve run out of steam so I’ll leave you to stew in your own juice. It’s actions like yours that have turned all police in North America into potential enemies of the public at large. This is being published as a warning never to trust a cop or tell them anything. To do so puts your rights and freedom at risk!

Now I Wait For You To Knock on My Door
Blaine Barrett



Thursday, 10 October 2013

A CRITICISM AND REBUTTAL



It’s All a Question of Standards

You’ve Either Got Them or You Don’t!

Nearly six weeks ago, I published “The Two Faces of Dr Danial Schecter”. It was not only an expose of his motivation but I also accused the author, Tom Blackwell, a Senior National Reporter with the National Post, of plagiarism and distorted reporting.

I hurt his feelings and he felt compelled to contact me and protest my defamation. Following you will find his protest and criticism of my post followed by the rebuttal I just sent him.

Enjoy:

<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>

I received this e-mail from Mr. Blackwell

Dear Mr. Barrett

In a search for some other information, I came across your blog post last month about my story on Dr. Danial Schecter. I gather that you make a habit of throwing around off-the-cuff, defamatory comments about various people, but please be advised that accusing a journalist of plagiarism, as you did in this post, is about as libellous a statement as one can make about a member of my profession.

To be completely clear, despite your comments, I had never even looked at your blog until today and certainly never "plagiarized" anything from it. 

Please immediately remove any reference to my having used your blog as research for any story of mine, and any suggestion that I plagiarized.

Thank you very much for your attention to this serious matter.

Yours

Tom

--
Tom Blackwell
Senior National Reporter
National Post

<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>

I gave his request some serious thought and have replied:

Dear Mr. Blackwell

Please note that both your note and this answer will be published to Google+, Facebook, and to my following.

You take your professionalism highly, but I have no intention of retracting anything. Why should I? If I make defamatory remarks they are not off-the-cuff they are intentional and my judgment of conduct. You allowed a two-face liar trying to protect his money flow and propagandize and you never checked your facts about the BS he was spouting.

You were absolutely silent about the fact that if Dr. Schecter saw any of Dr’.K’s patients it was because Dr.K referred them to him unaware of the thievery he was sending them to. You totally ignore the possibility that when Dr. Schecter saw the patient he was in a hell of a lot better shape because Dr.K had committed the crime of signing his application and saving his life with pot..

Read your column again with my question and criticisms in mind and tell me it was a first class presentation of facts worthy of a respected professional.

Read my blog again and read about the atrocious victimization of the 4100 0f Rob’s patients by the OPP and CMA.

When are you going to do anything to bring that to the attention of your national public audience? Doctors are betraying their Oath and do harm to their patients: the OPP is Guilty of Criminal Negligence but the asshole head of the OIPRD is a useless turd who won’t listen. Nobody knows what is happening because you and your Professional Journalist crew in the upper echelons of the media are either totally unaware there is an atrocity in progress or you are all guilty of intentionally abandoning a problem that is far more worthy of publication than Dr. Schecter’s problems.

I did not say that you did anything! I committed no libel! I made allegations about you because that is what everyone is doing with no facts or proof. The Cops allege Dr. K is a criminal, Dr’ Schecter can allege his virtue and allege Dr. K’s medical competence and I allege you committed plagiarism. If you want, take your turn and allege I have committed libel. Feel free.

You want to do some real investigative journalism take an interest in the 4100 victims everybody wants to disappear without justice or compensation. You have a national audience who deserve to know what their government is doing. Tell them the facts for a change and earn your reputation.

If and when I see that I’ll reconsider a retraction and apology. Not before


Yours

Blaine