Vancouver Cops Are Criminals
They Ignore Citizen
Rights
All I want is some answers
A Follow-up to Request Number One
September 8,
2014
To: Mayor Gregor Robertson:
gregor.robertson@vancouver.ca
Cc: Chief Jim Chu pss@vpd.ca,
Cc: Constable Brian
Montague vpd@vpd.ca
Dear Mayor and Chief: A
month ago I sent you a request for information about the change in marijuana
policing and asked for clarification of some issues. Neither one of you even
acknowledged receipt.
This time when someone
decided to raid a dispensary without probable cause one of you appointed a
mouthpiece: Constable Brian Montague so I decided to go directly to him for clarification
Dear Constable Montague:
Re the VPD Informal Guidelines For "Illegal" Medical Marijuana Dispensaries:
I recently read your explanation of the rationale behind the actions taken against two Medical Marijuana Dispensaries as reported by Jeremiah Vandermeer, Cannabis Culture - Wednesday, September 3 2014
You were quite articulate
in outlining the entire reprehensible criminal
Dispensary business and
you were forceful in laying down the law to all of them” Putting your position
together from your statements equals
"Don't market to
children. Don't sell to children. Don't create fire hazards. Don't operate in a
manner that clearly puts financial gain ahead of public safety or providing any
type of medical service."
I can actually understand
those as logical objectives to enforce.
“That said, the VPD has a priority based
approach to policing and these shops are, for the most part, a lower priority
for our limited resources. That does not mean that one of these businesses
can't become a priority if public safety becomes a concern."It is quite reasonable that there is a high priority to public safety but then you take it too far!
“We do not want to prevent
someone from getting any form of medical care they may require," Montague
said, "but we have a duty to the public to ensure public safety is a
priority.”
In short:any threat to
public safety and you shut down the medication just so you can get some front
page exposure doing your job and blow some of those limited resources you value
so much.
You did not have probable
cause to commit these raids!
Per information you have
provided us:
Jim’s Weeds Raid was based
on anonymous allegations that some of his customers were taking advantage of
the low price and reselling it to minors in the neighbourhood. I see no
probable cause to invade Jim’s because he wasn’t charging enough. He was
selling to legitimate licensees at prices that us guys on the bottom could
afford. You guys busted and put him out of business because he was costing his competitors
in the “Street” business, not out of any concern for public safety.
There was no threat to the
public from the Jim’s Weeds operation and the Swat Team tactics operation was
carried out in a manner to provide maximum press coverage and yielded no result
as far as any indication of criminal misconduct or you would have arrested
somebody instead of confiscating their inventory and equipment to deter them
reopening. You would have been far further ahead to have closed down the
Medicinal Cannabis Dispensary operating right next door to Jim’s. They are not
only a threat to public safety but financial gain is their sole
motivation. They don’t know shit about
any medical benefit their products should be used for. You know they’re on the
Street selling crap but they might fight back.
I was amazed by your triumph in finding everything one expects to find in a Marijuana Dispensary. "Products comprised of dry marijuana and THC-infused edibles, including candy and cookies,"
What even worse to me is your opinion that the "appearance and packaging of many of these items could be potentially very appealing to children." You have no evidence whatsoever that the child attracting design was an intentional bait for child abuse yet you chuck it in to create the aura of evil of all of these criminals who were once again not arrested or charged.
Constable Montague: You
stated
“There is a reason those
businesses were targeted for enforcement while others have not."
I want to know what the
reason was! For each! What gave
probable cause that justified the invasion, search and seizure of contents,
harassing and threatening customers and staff: Cops acting like a bunch of pigs at
the hog trough to create an image of the force on the job and then walking away
with not one bloody charge to justify the waste of time and money for blatant
political posturing?
Who was the individual
who authorized this raid and who gave him the power to waste money on stuff
like this crap?
“Compassion clubs and
med-pot dispensaries, though technically illegal, have existed in Vancouver for more than a decade. Police and City Council
members have been quoted in the press criticizing federal government policies :
Why are you now interfering
with the rights of patients to access medicine and pledging to leave
dispensaries alone, as long as they are providing marijuana for medical use.”
What happened? We had a
stable peaceful secure scene living here in Vancouver with a need for Medical Marijuana and the cops
weren’t an enemy? Both of the premises raided were providing marijuana for
medical use: what raises their profile above all the others? Any evidence to
support the anonymous accusations?
I would like to know who
the anonymous bureaucrat is and where he gets the right to make decisions that
fuck up my life and cost me money.
Constable Montague: I
would appreciate a reply.
I would appreciate an
acknowledgement of receipt and a reply within the next week.
Thank you for your time
and consideration
Blaine Barrett
By
copy to Mayor Robertson and Chief Chu.
Why is it necessary for me
to keep chasing a low level flunky to get information about whether you, his
superiors, are concealing either your roles or your ignorance of this public
betrayal of trust?
I sent you both a
detailed list of questions that you both ignored after the Jim’s Weeds raid. I really would like an
answer; you don’t even have to look for them: they’re out there on the Web at
I truly hope I can get a
response from one of: the Mayor? The Chief? Or (The designated Mouthpiece) but
I doubt I will. It seems that altitude on the Totem Pole removes our leaders
from any responsibility to answer questions regarding their conduct when
questionable.
I would very much like to
know if any of you had advance knowledge and gave consent to this betrayal of a
decade of respect for but I doubt I will.
The simple conclusion is
that if neither the Mayor or Chief Chu gave approval for these abusive tactics
then there is a Rogue in the Ranks and their command authority has been
violated and illegally assumed. What are you going to do about that? Somebody
started this shit and the voting public and residents of Vancouver deserve to know who.
I’m going to end here.
In conclusion I don’t
expect an answer except maybe some blow-by bullshit from Constable Montague but
very little in the form of fact or reasons.
I hope somebody will
provide some answers. What kind of odds that someone will? Astronomically negative!
We shall see
Blaine Barrett
No comments:
Post a Comment