The Progress of my Protest
Bureaucratic Ignorance and Indifference
As I Expected
Naughty! Naughty!
It has been
six weeks since I mailed my Denunciation of Gerry McNeilly to Ontario Premier
Wynne with copies to both the Minister of Safety and Corrections and the Attorney
General. The Premier responded quickly within a week with a note expressing
concern and advising that I would be getting a response from the Attorney
General to deal with my questions. I was pleased and prepared to wait.
While waiting for the Attorney
General’s contact, on Sept 23 I was surprised to receive a more or less
insulting dismissal to my Complaint from the Webmaster-Ministry
of Community Safety and Correctional Services. Whoever received the 20 page
complaint copy for the Minister failed to read it beyond the first couple of
pages. I was thanked for my complaint and documentation, given a lecture about
the scope and function of the OIPRD but since I had already been rejected by
the Director there was nothing the Ministry could do.
The
problem with this response is that the current 20 page complaint had nothing to
do with my previous dismissal, or the OIPRD. It was completely unnoticed that
the previous dismissal was simply the concrete evidence of the failure of the
Director to deal properly with my complaint. He ignored the Criminal Code Section
219.1 Criminal Negligence of the OPP that my complaint concerned. I did nothing
just sat and started to stew.
On October 05 my response from the Attorney General
arrived and it too had been routed down the chain of command to some “Agency and Tribunal Relations
Division” who concluded:
“We have noted your concerns regarding your OIPRD complaints and the
Independent Police Review Director. Thank
you for your feedback and for taking the time to contact the Ministry.”
Well in my game Two Strikes and you’re
out. The same stupid behavior of Gerry McNeilly apparently has infected the
upper echelons. Two high level employees, staffers got a 20 page complaint
either to or from to the Premier and supposedly the Attorney General had
received instruction to contact me as advised in the Premier’s acceptance.
The same cardinal sin occurred in two
Ministries of the Government:
1.
Someone assigned
to deal with a problem gets my Complaint
2.
t looks like a
lot of work: 20 pages for Christ Sake!
3.
What’s it all
about? Oh there’s a cover letter
4.
This says he’s
got a problem with the OIPRD and there’s nothing we can do.
5.
Alter Form letter
to express regret and inability to help and we can forget about it.
6.
The best part is
we don’t have to sign it so nobody can trace a bugger up back to you`.
I
responded to both contacts that they were fools who didn’t read any of the
details and they had screwed up badly. Whether the return addresses given
actually accepted or just scrapped my responses I will never know.
I know
from dealing with hundreds of people who have been blocked by bureaucracy:
details are never considered and mistakes are manifold.
I decided
that since the fools would not volunteer information then perhaps the Premier could
order them to tell me WTF is going on. I want transparency and I need answers
so I made some suggestions to the Premier.
My
Letter to Premier Wynne
Kathleen Wynne, Premier October
13, 2015
Legislative Building
Queen's Park
Toronto ON M7A 1A1
Legislative Building
Queen's Park
Toronto ON M7A 1A1
Ref: Your e-mail of September 8,
2015 regarding my
Denunciation of a Government
Appointee
The Response to your correspondence file#: MC-2015-5305
Dear
Premier Wynne:
I very much
appreciated your acknowledgement of my complaint and your advisory that I would
be contacted by the Attorney General for a follow up on what was going to
happen. At this point I have received replies from both the Attorney Generals
office and the Safety and Corrections Ministry and I suggest you brace
yourself, I think you will be ashamed of both responses.
Safety and
Corrections replied first on Sept 23 and the Attorney General followed on
October 5 and I am sorry to report that both reflected the same inattention to
detail flaw that betrayed Director McNeilly. They both received the same 20
page complaint and both read only the first page or two to the point where they
felt they could dismiss my complaint with no further action.
Safety and Corrections advised:
<><><><><>
“A complaint
may be about the services or policies of a police service, or it may be about
the conduct of a specific officer or officers. I understand from your
correspondence that you have already filed a complaint with the OIPRD and its
decision was that there was no indication of any breach of the Code of Conduct
by the OPP. The OIPRD Director’s decisions are independent from the Ontario
government, the police and the community. As the OIPRD has the final say in
this matter, neither the OPP nor the Ministry of Community Safety and
Correctional Services have jurisdiction to pursue this matter further.
Sincerely, Webmaster, Ministry of Community Safety and
Correctional Services
<><><><><>
The anonymous author of that
dismissal read only as far as the identification that I had a previous
complaint with the OIPRD so he could dump me. End of problem.
<><><><><>
The response from the Attorney
General was more of the same:
<><><><><>
“The
Attorney General is accountable to the Legislative Assembly for the overall
operations of the OIPRD. Her responsibility is to ensure that the agency’s
independence is preserved at all times. To ensure that independence, the
Attorney General cannot comment on, or become involved with specific complaints
that have been filed with the OIPRD, or potential OIPRD complaints.
We have noted your concerns regarding your OIPRD complaints and the
Independent Police Review Director. Thank
you for your feedback and for taking the time to contact the Ministry.
Agency
and Tribunal Relations Division
Ministry of the Attorney General
Ministry of the Attorney General
Cc: Mr. Gerry McNeilly, Independent
Police Review Director”
Why the hell is Director McNeilly getting a
copy of my correspondence with the Ministry.
<><><><><>
Neither
party bothered to read any of the details of the 20 page complaint or they
would realize that the complaint is not about the OIPRD but about Director
Gerry McNeilly. I provided proof he is guilty of criminal negligence in
ignoring the detail provided in my complaint. That ignoral has resulted in
another two years of Criminal Behavior by the OPP who are still in possession
of the 4100 files: that fact alone damns him as malfeasant In the performance
of his duty to seriously consider all complaints rendered against the Police.
At this
point I have to assume that nothing has been done as far as following up with
an examination of the evidence I provided and Director McNeilly is still in
possession of his title, his position,
and his salary. I want to make this perfectly clear and you can pass this on to
the Attorney General
1.
I want a signature on all correspondence. I will not deal
with anonymous nobodies who escape any responsibility for their performance.
i.e. Webmaster and Tribunal
2.
I want to know what is going to be done to Director
McNeilly. I want him suspended from his duties as Director and charged with
Criminal Negligence and I will accept nothing less. Six weeks have passed and
he is still in control of the cops, he should be out on bail!
3.
I want transparency to know the status of any investigation
now planned or under way and I want a source of follow up info. I would
appreciate a designated person as the source of my advice if possible.
At this
point I will leave whatever happens to you and wait for a response from the AG.
I feel it
only fair to advise you that this letter will be published as a follow up to my
post of my 20 page complaint “A Denunciation of Gerry McNeilly” on my blog Medical
Marijuana with TheSmeeGoanGuy at http://goan-smee.blogspot.ca/
This is
done not to pressure you but to advise the 4100 patients who had their file
seized what progress I am making in getting a little justice done to a bunch of
rat bastards.
I regret
having to do this but reality is reality
Blaine Barrett