Some Payback to a Prick
Nobody Tells Me to FUCK OFF
Director Gerry McNeilly
Office of the Independent Police
Review Director
MY PROBLEM!!
January 26, 2012 the Ontario Provincial Police raided the Office of
Dr. R. Kamermans in Coe Hill and in the process illegally seized, examined and
has retained all 4100 Patient Files related to Applications for Medical
Marijuana.
That is a fucking double
crime: Criminal Negligence and Invasion of Privacy
In July, 2013 I complained
of this crime by the Ontario Provincial Police. I was compelled to complain to the
Director at the Office of Independent Police Review as he is the only one who
can authorize an investigation into Police misconduct and lodge charges if
warranted.
What happened? I got
ignored. In short I felt like I had been told to “Fuck Off”.
I was treated as a “White Nigger”
by a Real “Nigger” and it is payback time
I recently found out that all 4100 missing
Patient files from The Kamermans Raid are still in the custody of the Crown
wherever the next trial is and that proves the Crown guilty of Criminal
Negligence. They are illegally holding these files without probable cause. The
fact that Asshole Director McNeilly would not investigate my complaint means
the crime has been continuing in process because he ignored it for over two
more years.
Decisions by the Director of
the OIPRD have no means of appeal or overrule but I decided that since he is a
Government appointee by a previous Attorney General he as a last resort has to
answer to the top of the Food Chain for his double dipping job.
Accordingly what you will
find following is:
My 2 page cover letter to
Premier Kathleen Wynne:
My 1 page cover letter to
Director McNeilly
My 17 page “A Denunciation
of Gerry McNeilly”
This is my appeal to the
Premier to hold the bastard responsible for what he has done. I explain to her
what I believe has happened in great detail with manifold facts to back my
allegations but it is now up to her and her Government to verify my complaint
as the truth by finding out what the truth is from a bunch of cops who are all
skilled liars and all the action has all been under the table within the
membership of the Blue Brotherhood that is devoted to protecting its members
from any prosecution that might set a precedent of a cop actually found guilty
guilty of a crime less serious than murder.
That I believe is enough introductions
so to begin here is my starting complaint to Premier of Ontario : Kathleen
Wynne. We shall see what develops.
<><><><><><><>
My Cover Letter to Premier Wynne
Introduction to my Complaint
Kathleen
Wynne, Premier August 28, 2015
Legislative Building
Queen's Park
Toronto ON M7A 1A1
A Denunciation of a Government Appointee
Dear Premier Wynne:
Much as I regret to inform
you, I have been the victim of Criminal Negligence and had my Personal Privacy
invaded by the Ontario Provincial Police. The crime occurred in Feb. 2012 with
the illegal seizure, retention, and refusal to return 4100 patient Medical
files that each contained an approved Application for Medical Marijuana: one of
which was mine.
June 20, 2013 I formally lodged a Complaint
with the Ontario Office of Independent
Police Review and requested the Director launch an investigation. My request
was denied on a technicality: I appealed that decision directly to the Director
and was denied with no reason given. There was no attention paid to the
manifold details my letter and Director Gerry McNeilly never read any of it. In
this instance his refusal to investigate the manifold allegations I made is a
sheer refusal to do his duty: to read every complaint submitted and if
warranted request the Police to investigate themselves.
There is no way to appeal a
Decision regarding an investigation into Police Misconduct. I was at a dead end
until I discovered the Information and Privacy Commission had located the
presence of 4100 Personal Patient Medical Files in the Custody of The Crown.
The Crown Prosecutor of the Kamermans trial is apparently still holding the
files as evidence and he has no right to do so. The contents of those files are
personal and private and he should not be able to open any one of them without
a warrant based on Probable Cause.
I am going to leave it to
you to solve the problem that has infected your government. Director McNeilly
has engaged in Criminal Negligence by ignoring my request and has permitted a
despicable crime to continue and is still in process to this date. The
deception and cover-up will become apparent but his manipulation of information
supplied has tampered both your Ministries of Justice and Community Safety and
Correctional Services. The Cops took the files and the Crown Prosecutor is
illegally holding them. I have taken the liberty of sending a copy of the
Denunciation to both Minister of Community Safety and Corrections, and Minister
of Justice. I am given to understand that the Attorney General has the power to
appoint the Director. I hope that also includes the power of removal.
Premier Wynne: In conclusion
let me state that I think you will understand my relationship to Mr. McNeilly
bears a marked resemblance to your relationship with cold fish Harper our PM.
LOL Neither one pays any attention to
duty and that makes them both liars. I despise Liars and thieves and tolerate
neither. I believe I am a man of Character: the first requirement being a man
of Honour with Honesty my most valued principle. Old school but Good school!
All I ask is that you reply and advise me what
can be done to remove the cancer and straighten this mess out.
My contact information is on
the letterhead and I am always available for
e-mails or phone contact.
Best regards
____________
Blaine Barrett
<><><><><><><>
My Cover Letter to Director McNeilly
Director
Gerry McNeilly August 28, 2015
Office of the Independent Police Review
Director
655
Bay Street,
10th Floor
Toronto, ON M7A 2T4
Dismissal Works Both Ways: My Justification for Yours
Follows
Sir:
Over two years ago I lodged a complaint to you at the
OIPRD but before I did I thoroughly checked your background and I was very
impressed with the extent of legal knowledge that you must have acquired in all
those years of service. Ever hear of CC219(1). Apparently not.
I submitted my complaint about Police criminal
activity with the expectation that you would do what your mandate in office
described as your primary function and duty: but you did not
- Thoroughly read my Complaint: but you didn’t.
- It was screened out by a subordinate and rejected on a false
technicality and signed by her.
- I sent you an appeal that started with an expression of my anger.
In my frustration I used a couple of words of profanity that you
apparently took as a personal offence and refused my appeal out of spite
for the insult
- You never bothered to thoroughly read the allegations I made and
the supporting evidence I submitted or you never would have been stupid
enough to reject my appeal for no reason as you did and request I never
contact you again. That was an act of Criminal Negligence and Malfeasance
of your Mandate.
You have no idea of the enormity of the crime as I
see it as an intentional manifold Invasion of Privacy by the Police in search
of information.
You have no idea of the damage you have done by
betraying my trust and treating me as a “White Nigger” asking “Massa” for a favour, when I expect to be treated as a 73
year old Canadian due some respect. I don’t like being treated like excrement!
There has been harm done to many of the 4100 victims
of the crime in the course of the past 3½ years and the following indictment is
my attempt to hold you accountable for that.
Hoping this Denunciation shames the shit out of you!
Regards
Blaine Barrett
<><><><><><><>
My Denunciation of Gerry McNeilly
Dear
Premier Wynne, Minister Naqvi and Minister Meilleur:
As I
understand the division of power in the Province of Ontario, you three, as a collective, are
responsible for the administration of Justice in the Province. I regret to
inform you that there exists a core of legal rot within the OPP and Court
system that has been kept from your purview and of which you are all totally
ignorant.
.
I regret to
have to inform you that within the Ministry of Community Safety and
Correctional Services and the Ministry of the Attorney General there
exists a criminal core of Ontario Provincial Police officers, of rank,
who over the course of the past three and a half years have engaged in a cover-up
of criminal activity that is still in progress.
You
Ministers and the Senior Administration have been kept totally unaware of the
critical nature of the rot at the bottom of the OPP/Justice barrel because of
what for years has been an extremely effective shield and filter denying
information of Cop Misconduct to the upper levels of authority and to the
General Public.
Director
Gerry McNeilly of the Office of the Independent Police Review is guilty of
Malfeasance in Office.
He has the
public trust that he ensures that all complaints of Police Misbehaviour be
carefully considered and, if warranted, made subject to investigation by the
Police and charges laid if the results warrant it.
He does not
do so and the evidence to prove it follows.
The Ontario
Constabulary is intentionally victimizing, for no reason, one of the poorest,
disabled and ill equipped populations in Canada who have no means to defend
themselves. It began as a stupid misdemeanour by a police force obsessed with
gaining forbidden information.
Over the
course of time this has come to include:
- Illegal seizure of Confidential
Medical Patient files
- invasion of their privacy
- a decision to risk harm to the
victims by refusing to release them,
- that constitutes Criminal
Negligence! Sections 219.1 and Sec 221
The OIPRD is aware of your
concerns. However, section 60(2) of the Police Services Act permits the
Director not to deal with a complaint if the complaint is made more than six
months after the facts on which it is based occurred. Taking all the
information into consideration, the Director has decided not to deal with your
complaint any further as it would not be in the public interest to do so.
It should be noted that
police were acting under authority of a judicially authorized search warrant.
It was signed by
Carmen
Lesperance
Case
Management Department
Ms.
Lesperance advised in her initial rejection:
“Please be advised that the Police Services Act, our
governing legislation, does not provide for a review process from the
classification and screening of complaints conducted by the OIPRD.
I was very pleased to note
that “A copy of your complaint as well as our decision not to proceed has been
forwarded to the Commissioner of the Ontario Provincial Police for their
record.”
Too bad the Commissioner,
like the Director apparently never reads his mail in detail or he would have
shat himself.
It is now to you to decide
how to handle Mr. McNeilly’s future in the sphere of Justice and Government. It
should not be hard: All you have to do is read the four Appendices noting the
mass of evidence reported to him and his failure to consider any of it. It
doesn’t matter if he read them or not; make your own judgement as to his guilt.
If he did not read them he failed in his duty and a crime slipped by the reach
of his authority. If he did read them and did nothing he has intentionally
covered up a crime-in-process and is party to it.
This was a formal complaint
of a crime in detail and as Director it was his duty to read it and initiate
some probe to determine its validity as grounds for an Investigation. I can
understand his missing my initial complaint because of a clerical interception
and rejection before he saw it. There is no justification for not reading the
initial complaint and rejection when he read my appeal.
That to me is Malfeasance in
Office. I cannot report it to the Director. He is the only one who can start an
investigation of Police Misconduct to bring these Cops to Justice and
punishment for their callous behaviour.
This cannot be allowed to
continue and for the purpose of making it known to the Public for their
protection I have distributed copies of this Indictment all over the place if
for nothing else shaming the cretins and preventing them from continuing.
Before you continue to the
Complaint for consideration you need to understand the context in which all
this happened and why the frustration of Police with Government led to the
vindictive persecution of a helpless minority.
When it Began and Why!
It all began about 2001 with
the refusal of Health Canada to release the identities and locations of Licensees
of the Medical Marijuana Access Program to the Police after the Regulations
came into effect.
Every police force in Canada wanted and requested access to the Licensee files because
they contained all the locations of every Licensed Marijuana Grow-op in Canada along with other valuable detail. They were all
turned down because the information in the files was related to illness and was
subject to Medical Confidentiality. Health Canada could not release it because they would be violating
Patient Privacy.
The desire for information
on growers festered and grew in the Police at a rate that accompanied the
exponential growth in MMAR Licensing.
The fervour to bust
Marijuana Grow ops cop mania of 2009 grew with the number of grow ops being
licensed under the MMAR. Health Canada refused grower locations to the Police and there
were thousands of legal grow ops. There were so many that it finally dawned on
the Ontario Provincial Police that there was a duplication of the information
they wanted in the filing cabinet of every Physician signing Applications and
there were not that many to track.
Unfortunately Dr. Rob
Kamermans of Coe
Hill Ontario emerged as the Physician responsible for a mass
signing of application Forms B1 or Form B2 for a License under the Medical
Marihuana Access Regulations and became one of the targets of a Joint
Task Force of police looking for drugs. They began to track Dr. K and by the
end of 2010 he had signed more than 1000 application and was accelerating his
output. Signing was not illegal and he was committing no crime and by mid 2011
he had a large pile of thousands of applications that all contained useful
information and the Police could not go into those file without committing an
Invasion of Privacy.
In 2011 some trivia hound in
the force noted that an invasion of privacy is not a “Crime”. There was no
punishment of serious consequence. Another devious twist and someone came to
the conclusion they had to do was gain access to the Office and that required a
warrant. They plotted and schemed and planned a raid on the office and carried
it out. They raided the Office, arrested Dr. Kamermans, seized, removed, and
examined all the files. By doing so they invaded the privacy of all 4100 with
no probable cause to do so, of them on the basis of a single warrant for drugs
and evidence of trafficking. They found none!
The Raid
On January 26, 2012 the office of Dr. Rob Kamermans in Coe Hill, Ontario was invaded by a combined force of OPP and RCMP. Dr.
Kamermans was arrested, removed and his office searched. Under the direction of
OPP Sergeant Marc Duval, the Medical Files of over 4100 patients (who had come
to the doctor to get their Applications for Licensing under the Medical
Marijuana Access Regulations
signed), were packed up, removed and have not as yet been returned. My
file was included in that seizure and despite manifold requests has not been
returned to me: That also holds for the other 4100 patient files! All my
initial requests to Sgt. Duval were repeatedly ignored and my phone calls not
returned. At this point someone of authority decided that the patient files would
not be released regardless of consequences.
The Infliction of Harm
It
is indisputable that one year after seizure of the files the patients to whom
they belonged all suffered harm of one sort or the other.
The majority of the files
seized related to patients who had already received their Licenses to Possess
or Grow their Medication, each with a validity of one year. All of them had
expired by January 26, 2013. Every patient was deprived of the Medical Paperwork
that enabled them to renew their license automatically. Without it they all had
to undergo the difficulty and expense of a re-examination by a Doctor. From a
profession now terrified by the treatment accorded Dr. Kamermans it was almost
impossible to obtain a signature without a great deal of trouble, stress and
expense and many patients just gave up on a License and a legal source of their
Medication.
Note well: what they have
been denied is medication that has been provided to alleviate
pain and suffering and the aggravating symptoms of disease that could result in
death. Through my associations I know of countless pains and problems inflicted
on my peers not the least of which is the ability to legally grow and the
mandatory prison sentence on conviction.
Every location of the grow
premises and the expiry date of the License give the police an open book of
probable cause to make a call re licensing as soon as the current one expires.
Many growers could not find a Doctor to replace the paperwork for his renewal.
Multiple invasions for recent license expiry: thousands of plants chopped for
no reason except legality: Hundred of pounds of finished Medical Marijuana were
confiscated and destroyed with no concern about depriving the patient or
causing side effects. The totality of the harm caused by Cop indifference to
the medical condition of their victims is incalculable at this point.
I will now leave you to read
the Appendices and make your judgement but before I do I think I should make
you aware of a potential financial liability that you will now face as a result
of this indiscriminate invasion of privacy by the Police.
Ontario’s New Tort of Invasion of Privacy
This whole mess began
because some cop realized that Invasion of Privacy in Ontario while illegal is
not Crime and there were no serious consequences in 2011 when they decided to
invade 4100 files, but times change and so does the Law. The perpetrators in this
instance waited too long and were still in commission of the crime when it came
into effect to the disgrace of the Force.
Unfortunately for Ontario an invasion of privacy is now an injury that is
subject to reparations and compensation from the defendant.
This changed in 2012 with Jones
v. Tsige, 2012 ONCA 32 and the ruling by
Judge Sharpe that in his view it is appropriate for this court to confirm the
existence of a right of action for intrusion upon seclusion. Recognition of
such a cause of action would amount to an incremental step that is consistent
with the role of this court to develop the common law in a manner consistent
with the changing needs of society.
Plaintiffs need not prove
any financial loss because of the defendant’s actions. Successful plaintiffs
are entitled to “moral” damages, and Judge Sharpe fixed the upper end of the
range for such awards at $20,000.
To establish the tort in Ontario, a plaintiff must show that the defendant’s conduct:
- was intentional (including reckless conduct);
- constitutes an invasion of the plaintiff’s private affairs or
concerns without lawful justification; and
- that a reasonable person would regard the invasion as highly offensive,
causing distress, humiliation or anguish.
All 4100 owners of these
files have all had their privacy invaded by the removal of the files and their
current location in the custody of The Crown proves the extent of their injury
by 3½ years of negligence. I am one of these qualified individuals and while
the judge put limits on the penalty awarded: that applies if no harm is done to
the victim. I believe he would be open to the consideration of aggravating
factors such as the recurrence of symptoms their return, aggravation and
rejection given the difficulty in finding a doctor to sign after the deterrent to
signing effect of Dr. Kamermans punitive treatment by the College of Physicians
and Surgeons of Ontario, the escalation of cost having to obtain from the
street instead of legally from suppliers at even more expense: Fear of arrest
for possession of your medication without a license and the threat of mandatory
sentencing are not comfortable when you are out in public.
Since I am first in line and
it has never been done before, I feel that you three are high enough on the
totem pole to request advice on how to obtain the do-it-yourself procedures to
file a suit, where to obtain the forms and advice on where and how to submit
them when completed. A simple How-To manual would be of great assistance to
Citizen Advocates because considering the monetary condition these victims are
in there is no way that they can even pay for legal advice or help and they
need all the help I can get them.
Farewell
I will now leave you to your
consideration of the evidence presented in the Four Appendices following and
look forward to your acknowledgement and response to the question “ Is there
any way to punish the perpetrators of this atrocious act or will they all just
walk back to their Squad Car?”
In anticipation of a prompt
reply
Best Regards
_____________
Blaine L. Barrett Phone:
604-585-0236
TheSmeeGoanGuy E-Mail: the smeegoanguy@gmail.com
#255, 10202-149St
Surrey BC V3R 3Z8
Appendices
Appendix #1
Office of the Independent
Police Review Director June 20, 2013
655
Bay Street,
10th Floor
Toronto, Ontario
M7A 2T4
Attn: Complaints
Dear Director:
First I must inform you I am
submitting this Complaint to you under protest.
I don’t think you have the
capacity to achieve the result I want in the time frame I have left in this
life. I am commanded to submit the Complaint to you and I don’t understand why
I have to submit to an investigation of the Police by the Police. I am lodging
a complaint that Section 219 of the Criminal Code of Canada was intentionally
ignored and violated by the whole bloody chain of command of the Ontario
Provincial Police. No-one is exempt and that includes the Chief of
Police/Commissioner of the OPP. He’s letting these criminals run wild. I would
prefer a different police force if possible?
I don’t understand you, as a
Provincial official, deciding matters of Federal Law. I have read your website
thoroughly and by submitting this to your authority I am compelled to accept
your decision as to the guilt or innocence based on an investigation of a
brother by his Blue Brotherhood. The only other option is to withdraw the
Complaint and walk away. I would like clarification of three phases of your
advice regarding
How will the OIPRD handle
my review?
.
- The OIPRD will also contact the police to tell
them you have requested a review and give them a copy of the form. We will
ask the police to send us all the information they have on your complaint.
- What
time frame are we looking at? What is the maximum time they can take to
respond and provide their documentation?
- Once we have received your file from the police,
we will assess your case and make a decision about it.
- If we agree you, the OIPRD will give
instructions to the Chief of Police/Commissioner of the OPP about your
complaint. The police must follow these instructions. We will tell you
about our decision and what happens next.
- What
if I disagree with your proposed instructions to Chief of
Police/Commissioner of the OPP? Do I have any input or control as to how
the investigation should be conducted?
In anticipation of your
acknowledgement of Receipt of my complaint:
Best regards
___________
Blaine Barrett
<><><><><><><>
OIPRD
Complaint #130005918
My name is Blaine Barrett
I live at 255, 10202-149St.,
Surrey, BC V3R 3Z8
SIN: 606-283-653
I have a Health Canada
License to obtain and possess cannabis
Phn: 604-585-0236
I have been the victim of
Criminal Negligence by Sergeant Mark Duval of the Ontario Provincial Police and
his superiors at the Central Hastings Detachment in Madoc, Ont. I am
accompanied by 4100 others as a consequence of the arrest of Dr.Rob Kamermans,
the seizure of his Medical Files and the refusal and failure –of the Police to
return them to their owners
On
January 26, 2012 Sergeant Duval and a force of combined OPP and RCMP officers
entered the office of Dr. Rob Kamermans at 2230 Hwy 620, Cob Hill, On K0L 1P0: arrested him and served him with a
search warrant for his office. They were accompanied by Swat Team members armed
with assault rifles who immediately secured the area to prevent any terrorist
attack and announced their arrival with a parade of cop cars, flashing lights
and sirens that no one within sight or hearing could avoid noticing: The
objective- Guaranteed headlines.
Dr’ Kamermans and his wife were alone in the
office at the time of the invasion. They were arrested, handcuffed, forced to
pose in front of a cop car for pictures of their arrest. Sergeant Duval and
cohorts proceeded to ransack the office in a search for evidence of some
unknown crime. In this process, Sergeant Duval seized and removed 4100+
medical records for inspection of their contents. He knew they were of
vital importance to their owners, full of secret information he wanted
but could not access and covered by Medical Confidentiality: so did all his
superiors.
I do not believe that access to the contents
of 4000 file can be justified by one single search warrant for a Doctor’s
office. The Official Policies of both the Canadian Medical Association and the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario state that the contents of any medical file in
the custody of a Doctor can only be revealed to medical professional necessary
for treatment. Any outside third party access must be authorized by a warrant
for that file. Every file was entitled to secrecy and a warrant. If this was an
intentional illegal breach of privacy by the police it was an illegal act
repeated every time they stuck their noses into a file. And on and on.
None of that matters to me because I’ve
tried to find out for over a year if it was legal and failed. No one will answer
at any level of responsibility. I have therefore lodged an FOI Request for both
the Warrant and the Information to Obtain
It does not matter whether file secrecy was
illegally breached or not, what makes me a victim and entitled to recourse and
justice is that Sergeant Mark Duval failed to return files with the utmost
speed to the patients to whom they belonged. Every person in the chain of
command knew that the failure to return these documents to their rightful
owners was to cause great hardship and inconvenience.
I am one of the patients who had their
applications seized. There is no record of my application because it wasn’t yet
in the files and the OPP won’t admit they have it in their possession. It was
waiting for me to get back to them with a replacement cheque. He had not yet
signed my application and all my documentation was in the Hold file. I
submitted my application in Mid-January and got the call a week later but
hadn’t sent a replacement cheque yet because there was no rush. I was outraged
by the seizure, inspection and refusal to return the medical files. It was a
outrageous invasion of privacy but I couldn’t complain. My file had not yet
been formally entered as a Medical File in his records and not yet subject to
Medical Confidentiality as private. It was just laying there, wide open.
It was
only two weeks ago that I became aware of Criminal Code Section 219 and its
applicability to police officers in the discharge of their duty
Criminal Code - Criminal negligence
· 219. (1) Every one is criminally negligent who
o
(a) in doing anything,
or
o
(b) in omitting to do anything that
it is his duty to do,
shows
wanton or reckless disregard for the lives or
safety of other persons.
Sergeant Mark Duval, The Central Hastings
Detachment supervisor and everyone in the OPP chain of command right up to
Queens Park and on up to the Prime Minister was aware of the arrest and that
4000+ Medical files had been seized and held as evidence , It was front page
news and a subject of controversy and discussion at the time of the seizure. It
is common and accepted knowledge that Medical Files are not only private but
also of critical importance in the treatment of the patient should there be any
change in his condition. In times of emergency these are the only source of any
medical knowledge of the patient’s condition prior to the current trauma.
Sergeant Duval and everyone in his chain of
command knew that there would be serious consequences to the patients who owned
them if the files were not promptly returned and there was an emergency. That
is simply common sense and a fact. There is no excuse of ignorance on the part
of the whole chain that this was a flagrant violation of Criminal Code Section
219 that law enforcement should do no harm.
They were fully aware that they would
intentionally be creating the risk of great harm in an emergency. What is more
contemptible is that this was in search of information that was beyond their
legal reach in the top secret files of Health Canada at the Medical Marihuana Access Division. The
identities, locations, class of grow-op, capability and size, the most
importantly the expiry date of every one of 4000+ Medical Marijuana The last
date of issue was before New Years 2012 so every one of them has now expired.
Sergeant Duval is still holding these files
and has not returned them, and not one of the superiors above him countermanded
his action and ordered their return before anyone suffered any harm from their
inaccessibility. What is most contemptible is that all them also was aware that
all licenses had a one year expiry and to not return them and deny access to
all the extremely valuable medical
documentation they contained was an intentional obstruction of the renewal
of every Medical Marijuana license.
The resultant harm can now be tallied up and
it is time the cops were stopped from arresting and charging medical marijuana
grow ops and possessors when their crime was the direct result of the arresting
cops preventing their renewal. It’s a premeditated entrapment.
There have been many more serious cases of
patients who have been harmed by lack of access to their medication and I have
heard of one death before information requested was forthcoming after great
efforts to get its release. A great number of symptom recurrences and physical
agony resulting from the inability to grow and maintain an adequate supply of
what should have been their legal medication supply.
I think the failure to recognize the
consequences of their action was intentional and criminally negligent. Sergeant
Duval was aware of the consequences of his actions and simply ignored the
damage he was causing. To me this is a
wanton and reckless disregard for the lives or safety of others and a
violation of Criminal Code Section 219. The chain of command was aware of
and ignored his actions and did not order him to cease and desist immediately.
They were aware of the damage being done and by failing to correct their
subordinate similarly showed a wanton
and reckless disregard for the lives or safety of others and are guilty of
a similar violation of the Criminal Code.
That is my complaint. I am a victim, I have
been damaged and I have a lot of company who are as angry as I.
Blaine Barrett
N.B.
This is not an isolated instance of the
intentional disregard of Section 219. It has become common practice for and
increasing number of police actions across Canada. As just one of two examples I know of a licensed
designated grower whose license expired because of the callous disregard shown
in my case. It may be hearsay but it appeared in Facebook. It was a large
facility handling two grows for patients with authorization for large
quantities of edible cannabis. The grower was arrested, his crop chopped, all
cannabis seized, all grow equipment worth thousands destroyed or confiscated.
They were fully aware that the two licenses to grow were large and destined for
patients with symptoms severe enough to warrant the size of the licenses: and
that the cannabis that they destroyed was a legal medication and to confiscate
it was to initiate the recurrence of pain, nausea, and manifold other symptoms.
There have been multiple similar instances
of smaller personal and designated grow ops being shut down because of the
intentional obstruction of their license renewals.
In a similar vein, the police disregard for
the necessity of dispensaries and their arbitrary closure causes great harm and
inconvenience to every one of their customers. They don’t sell to the street,
they sell to licensed customers and their closure has the same effect as
chopping down a legal designed grow op.
<><><><><><><>
Appendix #2
OIPRD Complaint #130005918
Rejection July 17, 2013
Sent Via Email:
thesmeepoanguygmail.com
Dear Mr. Barrett:
Re: Public Complaint - Ontario Provincial Police
OIPRD Complaint Number— 130005918
The Office of the
Independent Police Review Director (OIPRD) has carefully reviewed your
complaint about the alleged conduct of Sergeant Mark Duval and Sergeant Rob
Henderson of the Ontario Provincial Police.
The OIPRD is aware of your
concerns. However, section 60(2) of the Police Services Act permits the
Director not to deal with a complaint if the complaint is made more than six
months after the facts on which it is based occurred. Taking all the
information into consideration, the Director has decided not to deal with your
complaint any further as it would not be in the public interest to do so.
It should be noted that
police were acting under authority of a judicially authorized search warrant.
Please be advised that the
Police Services Act, our governing legislation, does not provide for a review
process from the classification and screening of complaints conducted by the
OIPRD.
A copy of your complaint as
well as our decision not to proceed has been forwarded to the
Commissioner of the Ontario Provincial Police for their record.
To find out more about our
screening process and the Police Services Act, please visit our website at
www.oirpd.on.ca.
Yours truly,
Carmen Lesperance
Carmen Lesperance
Case Management Department
Local: 416-246-7071 Ext.
1204
Toll-free: 1-877-411-4773
Ext. 1204
Appendix #3
OIPRD Complaint
#130005918
Appeal of Decision to
Reject July 20, 2013
Subject: OIPRD Complaint #130005918
Office of the Independent Police Review Director
655 Bay Street, 10th Floor,
Toronto, ON M7A 2T4
Attn: Mr. Gerry McNeilly, Director
Ref: OIPRD Complaint #130005918
Dear Mr. McNeilly:
I have a problem. Two days ago I received a reply to
my complaint from your office. A Ms. Carmen Lesperance of the Case Management
Department advised me that section 60(2) of the Police Services Act permits you
to not deal with a complaint if it is beyond some ridiculous six months statute
of limitations.
I am further advised that you have decided not to
deal with my complaint because it is not in the public interest.
Bullshit!
I doubt very much that you have even seen my
complaint. It got scanned by Case Management who jumped on the date and
disposed of the problem with great dispatch using the prime loophole for work
avoidance. If I sound pissed off and disillusioned I am. I take the time to
file a formal complaint`, I get a rubber stamp refusal, effectively get told to
fuck off and there is no appeal. If that is your decision then I want a
refusal to accept my complaint signed by you.
Before you send that confirmation of your decision
please read the goddamned complaint and notice that the reason for the charge
of Criminal Negligence against Sergeant Mark Duval is that he did not do his
duty refused to return valuable personal private files to their owners causing
great harm to many of them.. Please note that he is still doing so
and there is still another six months to go before the statute of
limitations applies to the crime he is committing today! He’s violating
Criminal Code Section 219- Criminal Negligence by not doing his legal duties
and returning the files.
There is no longer any reason to hold them.
He has already successfully sabotaged the renewal of
every license by denying access to all the documentation required for its
renewal. 4100 patients had to go and get Brand new medical certification of
their diagnosis and suitability for renewal because a fucking totally
despicable asshole refused to return them. The harm he caused was not neglect
it was intentional vindictive damage to people who can’t fight back.
You state they had a search warrant and they did, but
I cannot conceive how one search warrant can provide grounds or probable cause
for the invasion of privacy of 4100 Medically Confidential files secure from
third party access without a warrant for each file.
By accessing these files they illegally obtained the
identities, locations and most importantly, expiry dates for every personal and
designated grow op license. This permitted them to set a target date for a raid
to determine whether the problems with renewal, caused by their withholding
essential documentation, had produced the crop of unlicensed grow-ops they
could destroy and charge the grower.
This matter needs attending to right bloody now but
if you can’t be bothered to help protect the rights of these 4100 innocent
victims you are effectively sanctioning police brutality and that is not in the
public interest.
I have no idea what to expect in return to this
request for reconsideration and certification of your decision. I’m not
optimistic anything will be accomplished in the foreseeable future even if you
launched a full scale witch hunt. It’s only taken thirteen years to get the
first cop charged with G20 offenses to come to court to get dismissed, why
should I expect different here?
One thing you could do without a great deal of
difficulty is call the OPP command and ask them if they could request Sergeant
Duval’s approval and ask if he would arrange for the prompt return of the
files. He’ll probably tell them to “Fuck Off!” like he tells the rightful
owners of these files but it are worth the effort. Please do so! Please advise
if there is any way to take these bastards to task.
An extremely disillusioned victim
Blaine Barrett
Appendix #4
OIPRD Complaint #130005918
July 20, 2013
The Director’s Denial of my Appeal
Sent Vía Email:
thesmeeqoanquv@qmai|.com
Mr. Blaine Barrett
255-10202- 149 Street
Surrey, BC VSR 328
Dear Mr. Barrett:
Re: Public Complaint- Ontario Provincial Police
OIPRD Complaint Number-
130005918
Your email correspondence of
July
20, 2013 has been reviewed
and does not alter the outcome of my decision sent to you by email dated July 17, 2013.
I must advise that the
contents of your letter are somewhat concerning given the language and
comments.
Further correspondence of
this nature will not be responded to.
Yours truly,
Gerry McNeilly
Gerry McNeilly
Independent Police Review
Director
<><><><><><><>
Conclusion
That is the end of my
submission and I can verify my action with Track Numbers from Canada Post.
My Expressposts to the
primary four were all delivered today
My complaint does not stop here. I am also sending
notification of the problem to all remaining 104 Members of the Ontario Provincial
Parliament as well as 32 National News Sources- Television and Print. No kissy
for them either
Copies of those
notifications will form the balance of my next post.
Blaine Barrett
