I have begun to believe my mind is full of tiny little topics that act like pimples.

No one can predict the order they start to fester in, or when they’ll get ripe and burst.

Thursday 31 October 2013

A Tragic Triangular Impasse




Stupid Stevie is Dreaming the Impossible Dream.


He’s Created is an Impossible Stalemate!

In the past two years of my advocacy for Medical Marijuana I have watched the disintegration of the Medical Marihuana Access Regulations, their rejection by the Courts, and their coming replacement by Harpo the Hypocrite’s Marihuana for Medical Purposes Regulations. Everything’s ground to a halt.

We now have Three competing power groups with no negotiation possible:

1.    The first and foremost group is the Asinine Harper Government with its completely misguided attempt to create a monopoly system to produce and distribute Medical Marijuana. There is nothing of Medical Benefit about their system because ir is designed to create a commercially profitable system supplying a product that will not meet the manifold requirements demanded by its potential customer base.
There is no concern over any positive or negative impact on the Medical Consequences because they can always shift the responsibility for the program’s failure on the Canadian Medical Association.


2.    The second Power group is The Canadian Medical Association. It is actively opposing the Government’s shift of responsibility for authorizing Cannabis use from Health Canada to the Medical profession. They have retaliated by launching what is an undeclared illegal wildcat strike and lockout with their refusal to sign authorizations for Cannabis use. This blanket denial is defended as necessary because of the lack of information about the risk of long term use. There is little or no risk but they site the absence of statistically validated pharmaceutical grade research and studies as cause for refusal to cooperate.

3.    The third and most concerned group is all of us: the Potential Patient Customers. We, as a group, have unreasonable expectations that will never be met with the current adversarial approach of the other two.

It is a stalemate that can only be resolved by negotiation and compromise and that excludes the Government. There is no negotiation possible with a collection of authoritarian lying sycophants with their noses stuck in Harpo’s ass. Reason is not part of the Cons skill package.

So where does that leave us?

In a position where we can ignore Government influence and in a new position where we may be able to resolve the differences in goals of Doctors and Patients. The appointment of Dr. Louis Francescutti as President of the CMA opens a new avenue of approach that I think can resolve difference. He is a completely unknown player and last weekend I reached out, identified myself and requested that he contact me regarding making peace between Doctors and Patients.

As part of that Peace pipe proposal, was a shorter introductory version of the following project proposal and he will be copied with this expansion for his consideration.

THESMEEGOANGUY Rx to Stalemate

With two groups interested in the Medical aspect of the problem but at extreme ends of the treatment scale. The CMA wants good information regarding all aspects of Cannabis therapy and the Potential Patient population has all the answers. There is no communication between the two and unless that gap is eliminated there will never be a solution found.

The complexity of the problem becomes even more convoluted when the number of variables to be considered is magnified a thousand times. A large number of the patients most concerned are those who over the course of years have devised a personal treatment that works for them. They have selected hybrids as a source crop, and complex processing procedures to make the medications they use to successfully alleviate their symptoms. As a collective they possess all the knowledge the CMA needs and they need the CMA for a signature to purchase and possess their raw materials.

I am no doctor but I am a damned good statistician, a superb analyst and I’ve got excellent common sense. Combine that with humility that is exceeded only by my good looks and you wind up with brilliance or a fool. I believe that there is a way to break this impasse and I am now proposing it to you for your judgment of its merit. It will need polishing but it could work but only if the CMA assumes its proper role as a leader of a profession devoted to the welfare of patients. At the moment they are paralyzed by an obsession with risks and are blockading effective treatment and that must stop.

The risks they fear can neither be qualified nor quantified: What are the risks and how serious are they? They don’t know what they fear and my proposal is that they start doing some Research to find out what the Bogeyman is. The CMA is the only one who can! They have mistakenly interpreted the MMPR as requiring them to authorize the use of marijuana as a medical treatment. It does no such thing.

The responsibility of the physician under the MMPR limited to the same declaration required by the MMAR. Whatever steps taken to establish grounds for a signature, all the attending Physician is doing is certifying an applicant has symptoms of a disease that requires further treatment. There neither is any recommendation as to what that treatment shall be, nor is it a prescription for medication. It merely establishes the right to purchase and possess as much cannabis as required for the patient’s medical needs. The origin of the Cannabis purchased, legal or illegal, is none of the physician’s concern nor is the quantity purchased. All his signature accomplishes is giving the Patient immunity from arrest and prosecution for possessing his medication: If he elects to buy pot instead of a stereo.

Let’s Make A Deal

The one thing that is certain is that Stephen Harper wants his Commercialization of Marijuana to succeed. A continuing blockade to Customers by Doctors is not to be desired when the doors to his Marihuana Monopoly scheme open for business in April. The CMA should have a really good look at the huge pile of money he’s talking about. A billion and a half?

Gee? I wonder what our Fearless Leader would pay for Doctors to wholeheartedly agree to support his program in the interests of speeding up the supply transfer to Licensed Growers and no shortages to patients.

Minimum 10% Max? plus immunity from risk. Not too much to ask:
This is risky business so the CMA should request financing to start a Research Program to assess that risk. There is a risk of a completely unknown probability and any Doctor participating as a researcher and dealing within the program must be exempted with no liability that for outcome under both Criminal or Civil jurisdictions.

The Program would allow any licensed physician to participate as a researcher subject to guidance regarding the Doctor/Patient relationship that will be established per protocol.

This is a simple trade. Any doctor feeling qualified to do so can establish a legally binding relationship with a Patient that exchanges
access to cannabis for complete disclosure of the patient’s treatment regimen and detailed follow ups to assess progress.

The CMA wants data related to both the short and long term use of marijuana regardless of method of use or product used and dosage. There is none. Gather some! Get off your ass and gather some

Patients want maintenance of the level of medication they are currently using for relief of their particular symptoms preferably in the same form or better if found. Provide

Create a research project to gather the data you want with a trade.

The Doctor trades his approval for a patient’s medication requirement because he is participating in research, supplying an experimental drug and recording the treatment progress in order to assess its effects. Because it is an assessment of risk there must be no responsibility or liability for an unexpected bad outcome. Ensure that factor with Health Canada.

The Doctor must be in control of the relationship and its procedural requirements but the patient retains control over what is done with the marijuana after purchase. The patient trades detailed access to his treatment regimen and medical progress and any changes made for the right to obtain or create his own medication, He agrees to periodic reports and/or assessments to be determined. At this point there are 30,000+ potential research subjects waiting for the opportunity to share their knowledge for weed. All they need to know is that some doctor is going to look after their interests instead of their own and the flood gates will open.

As a statistician I am astounded by the immense pool of information about cannabis medical utility that can be extracted from 30000 users and the speed that it can be now be analyzed and understood.
With an intelligent first examination by the doctor and a structured interview, his physical symptomology and its severity is known, and a baseline established that can be expanded to include:

1.    A complete history of the patient’s use and treatment mode
2.    A marijuana sample to be used for genetic and pharmacological analysis
3.    A sample of any creams, oils, teas, or any product ingested
4.    An identification of the method of use

If all 30000 of the growers responded for just that first interview you could pull complete knowledge about every hybrid plant’s genetics and its potential as a producer of whatever cannabinoids are the effectors in any product used. You now have an established baseline: with a reasonable repeat assessment and interview schedule and the help of the patient you can measure whatever is changed in the treatment regimen and the THC and CBD composition in whatever product they are using and a verbal follow up on physical benefits.

One other point that should be noted by the CMA re their role in the matter: opposing is simply inflicting aggravation on patients who already have enough to worry about with the loss of personal and designated growth. Your signatures are of diddly shit importance to any potential grower who is in the position of having to grow his own because he cannot afford purchase it at current price levels. They are doomed to grow criminally under threat of arrest by the Cops and ruination from misguided building inspectors if their medication source is discovered.

That is a sourdough ending to what I think is a reasonable path to reconciliation and the restoration of a Doctor/Patient relation based on respect and trust. That is a far better outcome than a continuation of the current Doctor/Patient relationship based on lies, paranoia, fear and contempt. It can’t get any worse for the CMA image as seen by the Medical Marijuana Patient Community: They’re an arrogant collection of unsympathetic liars who don’t give a damn about their patient pool. These ethical cretins are primarily interested in their own professional and financial security, not in our patient welfare. The CMA does not represent doctors: It is simply a lobbyist representing the commercial interests of a ridiculously intertwined snarl of corporations owned by Doctors that owns and controls the Canadian Medical System.

Nasty and unwelcome as this professional image has become, it’s completely warranted by the twelve years of obstinacy, opposition and misinformation accorded Medical Marijuana by the CMA that prompted me to write this.

Now I wait for a reply from Dr. Francescutti, the new CMA President. He’s an unknown quantity at this point. If he responds to a Commoner, and the nature of his response will be most revealing as to where we are all going.

Now we wait and Go Figure!   Until ???

Thanks for your interest
Blaine Barrett


Wednesday 23 October 2013

I've had a Bad Week



This Sums It All Up!






Seems Mr. Hale Hit A Dead End Too!

I’ve had a bad week. I was going hell bent for election at my exercise program and overdid it, then I got a bladder infection and I collapsed. If you’ve had one you know the fire piss problem all too well: if you haven’t be thankful. It wasn’t the 40 times a night for a two teaspoon dribble that defeated me; it wasn’t the pain and burn each time I dribbled, it was a massive dose of that plus muscular pain and cramps, complete exhaustion and that constant I just don’t feel good focus. I went to the Walmart Walkin Clinic for Cipro and T3’s, got Cream of Tartar, Cranberry juice took the whole bunch and stopped dead in my chair and bed and stayed there until yesterday and I’m here now.

I had a very disturbing experience with my computer while I was lying here feeling sorry for myself and fortunately it made me realize the limits of what I can do by myself, in the hours that I can commit each day. In short, I lost Google and faced disaster for all my plans. There was no real problem but me but for two hours I lost my complete digital identity and access to all of my work and utilities.

When I went to sign into my homepage I was told my password was incorrect  and I was denied access to all my Google accounts including iGoogle, Google+, G-mail and worst of all Blogger. It was all false, but for two hours I had to think about everything I was losing control of: Projects and plans and big ideas. I had to look at what I had to work with to recover my advocacy and I pretty much came to the conclusion that there was no point in recovering much but a very small portion of my grand plans.

I’m too damned old and I’ve got to ease up. I don’t need any more stress than simple survival has to offer. So here goes the chopping block again.

Of my recent output I think you will all note I have been beating the drum about The 4100 Club for a Closed group, a community for Class Action and a pro-active protest collective. It’s a damned good Class Action plan that I believe could pay off but that is all I can ever do with it. There is far too much reasoning and explanation about what such an action is to waste and I will be publishing it but more as a general guide for a victims group or advocate.

The 4100 Club is a possibility but I won’t be the one to Administer it. There needs to be a central confidential circle for sharing ideas in private and that idea will be pursued. A place to participate with others about private problems and get group advice.

The simple fact is the 4100 victims have no impact as victims and it is all past history. If we were the survivors of any Canadian community that suffered a physical disaster we would be front page news. We are not there because we are the victims of a faceless bureaucracy and a timid national press. The Club has the potential of being a central locus of Agitation to wake the world up to what is happening and we are here to protest.

That sort of boils down where I want to go with my advocacy right back to where I started: It’s all a matter of principles. I’ve still got them but my world has lost them. I’ve now spent the last two years gathering evidence to support a complete loss of faith in our Democracy and its Governance. Not only under the Conservatives in Canada but under any collection of misfits operating under the secretive lying adversarial system that now infects Governmental Party Systems, the Global Commercial Conglomerate, and its greed.


So where does TheSmeeGoanGuy go?

What will be the driver of my advocacy?

What it has always been.

Character

WHY?

Because Nobody Knows What It Is

I note that over 50% of the recipients of my Newsletter announcing posts are not Canadian but rather US citizens. I have for some time wondered what the hell you guys saw in this raving Canadian maniac but I hope that it is my ethical scale of values that has kept you as followers. If not, hit “Bye” as requested because that’s what my new advocacy is about.

When it comes to ethical problems our countries are twinned.

I have decided to mount my “Bully Pulpit” and Bully some Bastards

A Simple Matter of Character is Not a Simple Matter!

Character is Complex and based on Six Foundational Pillars

Trustworthiness. Respect. Responsibility. Fairness. Caring. Citizenship.

Each of these pillars has a multitude of facets to be considered. It is on the shortcomings of our societal systems to even be aware of sufficient ethical probity to deserve our respect and trust. Simply look at the six Pillars and consider the three main targets for my Bully Pulpit sermons: Score each 1-6

1.     Politicians and Government    (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)

2.     Cops and Justice                    (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)

3.     The Medical Profession          (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)

Just how I intend to attack the character shortcomings of each is now in the planning stage and each requires a serious rethink. At this point I have only a vague idea of how to play a new game and no idea how productive I will be in the immediate future or how frequently I will be posting. I can assure you there will be progress reports as the framework of my advocacy develops.

I would like all of you readers to not only be patient and wait but to take the time now to do some serious thinking about the current state of your world with respect to the three foregoing focus groups. Given the relative importance of each to our well being it would seem the obvious place to find a Man of Character concerned with the proper governance of his group. After all the cream rises to the top doesn’t it?

If you have managed to read this far please read the page titled The Six Pillars of Character that I put on the right hand side of this page for your convenience. It’s an education in itself.

If you get nothing else from the article you will begin to understand the things that are missing when someone makes you a proposition and you feel uneasy about it. It’s the itty bitty details that all together add up to form the “Skunk” factor of the presentation. How badly it stinks is a pretty valid indication of the moral and ethical values lacking in the speaker and on that we base our opinion and trust. It’s not so much what is said but how the speaker twitches when poked. LOL.

On that note I am gone. Thanks for your patience.

Blaine

Thursday 10 October 2013

A CRITICISM AND REBUTTAL



It’s All a Question of Standards

You’ve Either Got Them or You Don’t!

Nearly six weeks ago, I published “The Two Faces of Dr Danial Schecter”. It was not only an expose of his motivation but I also accused the author, Tom Blackwell, a Senior National Reporter with the National Post, of plagiarism and distorted reporting.

I hurt his feelings and he felt compelled to contact me and protest my defamation. Following you will find his protest and criticism of my post followed by the rebuttal I just sent him.

Enjoy:

<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>

I received this e-mail from Mr. Blackwell

Dear Mr. Barrett

In a search for some other information, I came across your blog post last month about my story on Dr. Danial Schecter. I gather that you make a habit of throwing around off-the-cuff, defamatory comments about various people, but please be advised that accusing a journalist of plagiarism, as you did in this post, is about as libellous a statement as one can make about a member of my profession.

To be completely clear, despite your comments, I had never even looked at your blog until today and certainly never "plagiarized" anything from it. 

Please immediately remove any reference to my having used your blog as research for any story of mine, and any suggestion that I plagiarized.

Thank you very much for your attention to this serious matter.

Yours

Tom

--
Tom Blackwell
Senior National Reporter
National Post

<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>

I gave his request some serious thought and have replied:

Dear Mr. Blackwell

Please note that both your note and this answer will be published to Google+, Facebook, and to my following.

You take your professionalism highly, but I have no intention of retracting anything. Why should I? If I make defamatory remarks they are not off-the-cuff they are intentional and my judgment of conduct. You allowed a two-face liar trying to protect his money flow and propagandize and you never checked your facts about the BS he was spouting.

You were absolutely silent about the fact that if Dr. Schecter saw any of Dr’.K’s patients it was because Dr.K referred them to him unaware of the thievery he was sending them to. You totally ignore the possibility that when Dr. Schecter saw the patient he was in a hell of a lot better shape because Dr.K had committed the crime of signing his application and saving his life with pot..

Read your column again with my question and criticisms in mind and tell me it was a first class presentation of facts worthy of a respected professional.

Read my blog again and read about the atrocious victimization of the 4100 0f Rob’s patients by the OPP and CMA.

When are you going to do anything to bring that to the attention of your national public audience? Doctors are betraying their Oath and do harm to their patients: the OPP is Guilty of Criminal Negligence but the asshole head of the OIPRD is a useless turd who won’t listen. Nobody knows what is happening because you and your Professional Journalist crew in the upper echelons of the media are either totally unaware there is an atrocity in progress or you are all guilty of intentionally abandoning a problem that is far more worthy of publication than Dr. Schecter’s problems.

I did not say that you did anything! I committed no libel! I made allegations about you because that is what everyone is doing with no facts or proof. The Cops allege Dr. K is a criminal, Dr’ Schecter can allege his virtue and allege Dr. K’s medical competence and I allege you committed plagiarism. If you want, take your turn and allege I have committed libel. Feel free.

You want to do some real investigative journalism take an interest in the 4100 victims everybody wants to disappear without justice or compensation. You have a national audience who deserve to know what their government is doing. Tell them the facts for a change and earn your reputation.

If and when I see that I’ll reconsider a retraction and apology. Not before


Yours

Blaine